(mathematics) An infinite product representation of π/2, namely,
| Sci-Tech Dictionary: Wallis product |
(mathematics) An infinite product representation of π/2, namely,
| 5min Related Video: Wallis product |
| Wikipedia: Wallis product |
In mathematics, Wallis' product for π, written down in 1655 by John Wallis, states that

Contents |
Wallis derived his product as it is done in calculus books today, by comparing
for even and odd values of n, and noting that for large n, increasing n by 1 makes little change. Since infinitesimal calculus as we know it did not yet exist then, and mathematical analysis sufficient to discuss the convergence issue was inadequate, this was a harder piece of research than it sounds with hindsight, and more tentative. Wallis's product is, in retrospect, an easy corollary of the later Euler formula for the sine function:

in which we put x = π/2:


Stirling's approximation for n! asserts that

as n → ∞. Consider now the finite approximations to the Wallis product, obtained by taking the first k terms in the product:

pk can be written as

Substituting Stirling's approximation in this expression (both for k! and (2k)!) one can deduce (after a short calculation) that pk converges to π/2 as k → ∞.
If α is a root of a polynomial then (1 − x / α) is a factor. This leads to the conjecture that sin x might be of the form:

If this formula is true then A must be 1 because if x is small, the left side is approximately x and the right side is approximately Ax.
Of course, this does not prove (1). Euler proved it in vol. 1 of his Introduction using De Moivre's formula

He factored the difference of two n-th powers into linear factors using n-th roots of unity. He then used that for large n, cos x/n can be replaced by 1 and sin x/n by x/n. Later it was noted that Euler's use of complex numbers can be avoided as follows. For odd n, sin x is a polynomial of degree n in sin x/n and the roots of the polynomial are the numbers
where k is any integer. Factoring the polynomial, making n go to infinity and replacing sin y by y for small y one gets (1).
We can equate the above product for the sin x to the Taylor series for same:
Equation 2The next step is to equate the coefficients of x3 on both sides. The coefficient on the left hand side is the coefficient of x2 in the infinite product (as the whole thing is multiplied by x). Terms in x2 are produced when the '1' is chosen from all but one bracket and the x2 term is chosen from the remainder. So the x3 term on the left hand side is:

Equating the coefficients of x3 on both sides of equation 2 now gives

Finally, multiplying through by − π2 gives the value of ζ(2) (see Riemann zeta function):

Zeta(4) is defined as
.To derive a value in terms of π for this sum, we start out with Equation 2, but focus on products of neighboring factors, such as
. These products supply us with terms that are fourth degree in x, and when multiplied by x, will give us fifth degree terms that can be summed up and equated to
. We restate Equation 2:
Equation 2For the expression to the right of the x, the following observations need to be made:
gets multiplied by every other such term to form an infinite sum of
terms.
is not multiplied by itself.
:




![\cdots \Bigr] = \frac{x^5}{5!}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/6/a/4/6a4b3cc66e11c3aa0966d4570f4277e8.png)
Next, we divide both sides by x5, and multiply the same by π4:





....................................................................Equation 3More succinctly,
.The m < n operator indicates that every mth term has been multiplied by every nth term that occurs to the right of it in Equation 3. For example, we find 1 multiplied by 1/4 then by 1/9, then by 1/16, etc.
This is a very compact expression, but what we want is

We would like to derive it this way:
,so that we can exploit what we obtained in the last section.
The problem with this is that it's a little like trying to find a2 + b2, by calculating (a + b)2. An error factor of 2ab would have to be removed from the expansion of the latter. Think of 2ab as a heterogeneous product, because a and b are different elements.
When we specify the summation from n = 0 to infinity of
we are just asking for homogeneous products such as

and
.Imagine the way that m and n interact when both track from 0 to infinity. Along the way they generate products like
as well as
.
What, in aggregate, are the heterogeneous products that need to be removed? Twice all of Equation 3's left side, which contains all the possible coefficients of fifth degree heterogeneous products. Why twice? Because commutes exist in the product of the two summations. For every 1/4 times 1/9 there exists a 1/9 times a 1/4. The m < n index excluded commutes, as did the mass multiplication that it notates. This means that twice
has to be removed — twice the succint opposite side of Equation 3:

The two summations on the right are each equal to
, as was shown in the previous section. We write:

This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| List of topics related to π | |
| Pietro Mengoli | |
| List of formulae involving π |
| Why is joanne a wally? | |
| Who are laren and wally? | |
| Were the f is wally? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Wallis product". Read more |