Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

War profiteering

 
American Annals: War Profiteering

by Alexander Hamilton, 1778

As a soldier, Alexander Hamilton shared Washington's disgust with civilians who would turn the opportunity offered by the war to their own economic benefit. One case of such profiteering came to light in the person of Congressman Samuel Chase of Maryland, who took advantage of his position in the government to make extensive grain purchases that he knew would be needed by the French fleet when it arrived. It was this occurrence that set Hamilton to writing the letters signed "Publius" to the New-York Journal in the fall of 1778. The letter of October 19 is reprinted here.

While every method is taken to bring to justice those men whose principles and practices have been hostile to the present revolution, it is to be lamented that the conduct of another class, equally criminal, and if possible more mischievous, has hitherto passed with impunity, and almost without notice. I mean that tribe who, taking advantage of the times, have carried the spirit of monopoly and extortion to an excess, which scarcely admits of a parallel. Emboldened by the success of progressive impositions, it has extended to all the necessaries of life. The exorbitant price of every article, and the depreciation upon our currency, are evils derived essentially from this source. When avarice takes the lead in a state, it is commonly the forerunner of its fall. How shocking is it to discover among ourselves, even at this early period, the strongest symptoms of this fatal disease.

There are men in all countries, the business of whose lives it is to raise themselves above indigence by every little art in their power. When these men are observed to be influenced by the spirit I have mentioned, it is nothing more than might be expected, and can only excite contempt. When others, who have characters to support, and credit enough in the world to satisfy a moderate appetite for wealth in an honorable way, are found to be actuated by the same spirit, our contempt is mixed with indignation. But when a man, appointed to be the guardian of the state, and the depositary of the happiness and morals of the people, forgetful of the solemn relation in which he stands, descends to the dishonest artifices of a mercantile projector, and sacrifices his conscience and his trust to pecuniary motives, there is no strain of abhorrence of which the human mind is capable, no punishment the vengeance of the people can inflict, which may not be applied to him with justice.

If it should have happened that a member of Congress has been this degenerate character, and has been known to turn the knowledge of secrets, to which his office gave him access, to the purposes of private profit by employing emissaries to engross an article of immediate necessity to the public service, he ought to feel the utmost rigor of public resentment, and be detested as a traitor of the worst and most dangerous kind.

Source
The Works of Alexander Hamilton, etc., etc, John C. Hamilton, ed., New York, 1850-1851, Vol. II, pp. 156-157.
Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia: War profiteering
Top

A war profiteer is any person or organization that improperly profits from warfare or by selling weapons and other goods to parties at war. The term has strong negative connotations. General profiteering may also occur in peace time.

Contents

Types

Black marketeers

A distinction can be made between war profiteers who gain by sapping military strength and those who gain by contributing to the war. For instance, during and after World War II, enormous profits were available by selling rationed goods like cigarettes, chocolate, coffee and butter on the black market. Dishonest military personnel given oversight over valuable property sometimes divert it to the black market. The charge could also be laid against medical and legal professionals who accept money in exchange for helping young men evade a draft.

International arms dealers

Others make their money by cooperating with the authorities. Basil Zaharoff's Vickers Company sold weapons to all the parties involved in the Chaco War. Companies like Opel and IBM have been labeled war profiteers for their involvement with the Third Reich.

Commodity dealers

War usually leads to a shortage in the supply of commodities, which results in higher prices and higher revenues.

Politicians

Political figures taking bribes and favors from corporations involved with war production have been called war profiteers. Abraham Lincoln's first Secretary of War, Simon Cameron, was forced to resign in early 1862 after charges of corruption relating to war contracts. In 1947, Kentucky congressman Andrew J. May, Chairman of the powerful Committee on Military Affairs, was convicted for taking bribes in exchange for war contracts.

Civilian contractors

More recently, companies involved with supplying the coalition forces in the Iraq War, such as Bechtel, KBR, Blackwater and Halliburton, have come under fire for allegedly overcharging for their services.[1] The modern private military company is also offered as an example of sanctioned war profiteering.[2] [3] On the opposing side, companies like Huawei Technologies, which upgraded Saddam's air-defense system between the two Gulf Wars, face accusations for dealing with Saddam Hussein or nuclear aspirant Iran.[4] [5]

Military contractors

A group that always profits from war are the military contractors like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and General Dynamics (just to name the most important). Old military material has to be discarded due to age or is lost due to fighting, new and different military material is demanded by the military. This enables military contractors to increase their business and profit from war.

Anti-profiteering measures

Making unreasonable profits from war is widely considered unethical and is deeply unpopular, so attempts to prohibit excessive war profiteering, such as the imposition of an excess profits tax, receive much political support in wartime. Defining 'excessive' accurately is difficult, however, and such legislation frequently allows some instances of profiteering to go unchecked while reducing the income of others' war-related business to loss-making levels.

In the United States

Criticism of companies such as Halliburton in the context of the Iraq war draw heavily on the stereotype of the businessman profiteer. Slogans relating to 'blood for oil' have a similar implication.

Steve Clemons, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation think tank, has accused former CIA Director James Woolsey of both profiting from and promoting the Iraq War[6].

The Center for Public Integrity has reported that US Senator Dianne Feinstein and her husband, Richard Blum, are making millions of dollars from Iraq and Afghanistan contracts through his company, Perini [7]. Feinstein voted for the resolution giving President George W. Bush the authority to invade Iraq.

Indicted defense contractor Brent R. Wilkes was reported to be ecstatic when hearing that the United States was going to go to war with Iraq. “He and some of his top executives were really gung-ho about the war,” said a former employee. “Brent said this would create new opportunities for the company. He was really excited about doing business in the Middle East.”[8]

The War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007 intended to create criminal penalties for war profiteers and others who exploit taxpayer-funded efforts in Iraq and elsewhere around the world.[9] War profiteering cases are often brought under the Civil False Claims Act, which was enacted in 1863 to combat war profiteering during the Civil War.[10]

Major General Smedley Butler, USMC, criticized war profiteering of U.S companies during World War I in War Is a Racket. He wrote about how some companies and corporations increase their earnings and profits by up to 1700% and how many companies willingly sold equipment and supplies to the U.S that had no relevant use in the war effort. In the book, Butler stated that "It has been estimated by statisticians and economists and researchers that the war cost your Uncle Sam $52,000,000,000. Of this sum, $39,000,000,000 was expended in the actual war period. This expenditure Yielded $16,000,000,000 in profits."[11]

In popular culture

The term 'war profiteer' evokes two stereotypes in popular culture: the rich businessman who sells weapons to governments, and the semi-criminal black marketeer who sells goods to ordinary citizens. In English-speaking countries this is particularly associated with Britain during World War II.

The image of the 'businessman profiteer' carries the implication of influence and power used to actively cause wars for personal gain, rather than merely passively profit from them. In the aftermath of World War I, such profiteers were widely asserted to have existed by both the Left, and (fused with anti-Semitism) by the Right.

The surname of the character 'Daddy Warbucks' in Little Orphan Annie carries an obvious implication. This character is interesting for being an example of the stereotype of a war profiteer applied to a 'good guy'.

The Tintin adventure The Broken Ear features an arms dealer called Basil Bazarov who sells arms to both sides in a war. He is a recognisable example of this 'type', and specifically based on Basil Zaharoff.

The character of Joe Walker in the sitcom Dad's Army is an example of the second stereotype of a war profiteer while the character Rick Pym in the novel A Perfect Spy is a more psychologically complex example.

Brecht wrote the play Mother Courage and Her Children as a didactic indictment of war profiteering.

In the 1985 film Clue, Colonel Mustard was a war profiteer who sold stolen radio components on the black market.

The film The Third Man features a war profiteer named Harry Lime, who steals penicillin from military hospitals and sells it on the black market.

The Suicide Machines released their 2005 album, entitled War Profiteering Is Killing Us All.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "IRAQ FOR SALE: The War profiteers". http://iraqforsale.org/profiteers.php. Retrieved 12-07-2008. 
  2. ^ "Bush's Rent an Army". http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-scahill25jan25,0,4485578.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions. Retrieved 12-07-2008. 
  3. ^ "Bush's Shadow Army". http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070402/scahill. Retrieved 12-07-2008. 
  4. ^ "Revealed: 17 British Firms Armed Saddam with his Weapons". http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0223-07.htm. Retrieved 12-07-2008. 
  5. ^ "Chinese Firm Probed On Links With Iraq". http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/69802729.html?dids=69802729:69802729&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=MAR+17%2C+2001&author=Colum+Lynch&pub=The+Washington+Post&desc=Chinese+Firm+Probed+On+Links+With+Iraq&pqatl=google. Retrieved 12-07-2008. 
  6. ^ "WOOLSEY WATCH: Woolsey Needs to Make a Choice Between Being a War Profiteer or War Pundit". http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/000775.php. Retrieved 12-07-2008. 
  7. ^ "Windfalls of War". http://www.publicintegrity.org/wow/bio.aspx?act=pro&ddlC=45. Retrieved 12-07-2008. 
  8. ^ "[http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20070215-9999-1n15contract.html Politics Case shines light on how war contracts are awarded]". http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20070215-9999-1n15contract.html. Retrieved 12-07-2008. 
  9. ^ "Senate Judiciary Holds Hearing on Combating War Profiteering". http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200703/032007.html. Retrieved 12-07-2008. 
  10. ^ Grayson, Alan (2007), ""War Profiteering and Other Contractor Crimes Committed Overseas"", House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/June2007/Grayson070619.pdf, retrieved 12-07-2008 
  11. ^ Butler, Smedley (1935), War Is a Racket, Los Angeles: Feral House, ISBN 0-922915-86-5 

External links


 
 

 

Copyrights:

American Annals. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "War profiteering" Read more