01 25 93 in roman numerals?
I XXV XCIII
2 people found this useful
Roman Numerals are what Romans used to use for numbers. Differentsymbols have different numeral values. For example, I = 1, V = 5,and X = 10. When these symbols are combined in different ways theother numbers are formed. There are several rules for the placementof the symbols. . You may place up to… 3 of the same symbol adjacent to each otherto indicate addition. For example: I = 1; II = 1+1 = 2; III = 1+1+1= 3. Note that IIII is not proper because you may have no more than3 of the same symbol in a row. . You may place a smaller symbol after a larger one to indicateaddition. For example: V = 5; VI = 5+1 = 6; VII = 5+1+1 = 7; VIII =5+1+1+1 = 8. Again VIIII would not be proper because there are 4 Isimmediately adjacent to each other. . You may place a smaller symbol immediately before a largersymbol to indicate subtraction. For example IV = 5-1 = 4; IX = 10-1= 9. The basic numerals are: I = 1 V = 5 X = 10 L = 50 C = 100 D = 500 M = 1000 If it has a line over it, it means multiply by 1000, like L, wouldbe 50,000 Some examples of correct Roman Numerals: III = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 IX = 10 - 1 = 9 XIV = 10 + 5 - 1 = 14 XXXII = 10 + 10 + 10 + 1 + 1 = 32 LXIX = 50 + 10 + 10 - 1 = 69 MMVIII = 1000 + 1000 + 5 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 2008 MMIX = 1000 + 1000 + 10 - 1 = 2009 Here are some of the roman numerals: 1-I 5-V 10-X 20-XX 30-XXX 40-XL 50-L 60-LX 70-LXX 80-LXXX 90-XC 100-C 200-CC 300-CCC 400-CD 500-D 600-DC 700-DCC 800-DCCC 900-CM 1,000-M The first few Roman numerals are: I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII,IX, X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII and so on. ( Full Answer )
Romans used Roman numerals as their form of numbers. Romans needed Roman Numerals because they needed numbers to count, tell time, and do other things in life that involved numbers. Roman numerals were used because they could all be scribed using a flat chisel i.e X I V M.
most likely. they are called ROMAN numerals -- While I don't actually know the answer, I'd like to point out that the answerer before me is a moron, and read the question wrong. Just like in the name, Roman Numerals were started in Rome. Today, it is still used. Well now in every stats and c…ountries we use more simpler numbers. Like 1,2,3,4, and so on. We should think that we are really fortunate. Tank you for your question... 2010 November 21 Sunday ( Full Answer )
Roman numerals were the symbols developed by the Ancient Romans for counting and other numbering activities. The Romans used them because they developed them and that was what they knew. What do you use numbers for? They used them for the exact same things, instead of the kind of numbers we use, wh…ich are known as Arabic numerals. ( Full Answer )
the Romans did not knew the 1 2 3. so they used it for everything that involved numbers.
The Romans used Roman numerals because that was their way ofcalculating. Roman numerals are really very simple andstraightforward. For example, the I = 1, no problem there. ThreeI's - 3. C = 100, the Latin abbreviation for centum , M - 1000, theLatin abbreviation for mille. For us it takes a bit of …figuringout, but for the Romans it was simple; if a person could count, hecould read numbers. ( Full Answer )
XCIII (That's 100-10+1+1+1). C=100. X=10. We put the X before the C to show that it is ten numbers less.
The Arabic (0-9) number system did not reach Europe until about 900 AD. Roman numerals date back to 1000 years BC and were the marks made on tally sticks and in stone. Their style was influenced by the Etruscan number system. They were originally quite different symbols from those in use today. In t…he middle ages they were aligned to the closest modern roman alphabet equivalent shape. Roman numerals were not just confined to whole numbers, fractions were indicated by a series of dots, each number and pattern of dots meaning a different part of the whole. ( Full Answer )
Roman numerals.... 1 = I 2 = II 3 = III 4 = IV (or IIII on old clocks, watches and sundials) 5 = V 6 = VI 7 = VII 8 = VIII 9 = IX 10 = X 20 = XX 30 = XXX 40 = XL 50 = L 60 = LX 70 = LXX 80 = LXXX 90 = XC 100 = C 500 = D 1000 = M 2000 = MM 3000 = MMM After 3000 thousand are written by either placing… a horizontal bar over a numeral, to indicate that the numeral should be multiplied by 1000, or by placing the numeral inside brackets, which also indicates that it should be multiplied by 1000. Examples... 4000 = [IV] 10000 = [X] 523000 = [DXXIII] 1000000 = [M] The numbers 11 - 19 and 21 - 29 etc follow the same pattern as the numbers 1 to 9 but preceeded by X or XX etc. The same applies to numbers preceeded by 100s or 1000s. Some examples... 14 = XIV 44 = XLIV 88 = LXXXVIII 151 = CLI 423 = CDXXIII 666 = DCLXVI 1066 = MLXVI 2009 = MMIX ( Full Answer )
the romans used roman numerals like we use numbers but not as many people could write.
Roman numerals are a numeral system of ancient Rome based on letters of the alphabet, which are combined to signify the sum of their values.
\nXII/I/MCMLXXXIII\n. \nIs December 1st 1983, XII is twelve, I is one, and MCMLXXXIII is 1983
The creation of roman numerals was a long one. As the Roman empire developed they needed a method to count that was more than 10 fingers so they developed a system using the hand with numeric symbols. An example of this would be I stood for a single finger while V was for the whole hand, and X for b…oth hands. Trade required a means of math and so did the construction of roads and buildings. So, there is no exact date that can be given for this development. ( Full Answer )
Basically, yes. They were the main system of numbers used by the Romans. There were minority numeral systems in Rome, of which is still unknown.
They are: I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX XXI XXII XXIII XXIV XXV
Virtually all numbers can be made from various combinations of the 7 Roman numerals. I (1) V (5) X (10) L (50) C (100) D (500) and M (1000). -- further -- Adding a bar above any of the standard numerals (other than i) had the effect of multiplying that numeral's value by 1,000, so that a v w…ith a bar above it is 5,000 and an m with a bar is ( Full Answer )
01 = I. 08 = VIII. 1997 = MCMXCVII, so you'd write 01 08 1997 as I-VIII-MCMXCVII
MMVII/I/MMIX. I am not sure what the above answer is supposed to be. 2007/1/2009? That makes no sense. 07-01-2009 literally translated would be VII-I-MMIX. However, Romans did not use the same calendar we use today so there is no proper translations of July 7 2009.
Strictly speaking we should refer to Roman numerals as Etruscan numerals because it was the Etruscans who conceived the idea of numerals in the first place. The Etruscans once ruled the Romans and the Romans copied their counting system off them with modifications.
25 = x x v 06 = v i 1993 = m c m x c i i i
The Roman numeral system was used during ancient Roman times, butuse of the system continued long after the Roman empire declined.In the 14th century, Roman numerals were slowly replaced byHindu-Arabic numbers.
Today's conventional conversion of 01 10 2009 into Roman numerals is I-X-MMIX . However, the Romans themselves would have probably written the number 2009 as MMVIIII.
.XXV . Here the list of Roman: . I 1 . XXXII 32 . LXIII 63 . XCIV 94 . II 2 . XXXIII 33 . LXIV 64 . XCV 95 . III 3 . XXXIV 34 . LXV 65 . XCVI 96 . IV 4 . XXXV 35 . LXVI 66 . XCVII 97 . V 5 . XXXVI 36 . LXVII 67 . XCVIII 98 . VI 6 . XXX…VII 37 . LXVIII 68 . XCIX 99 . VII 7 . XXXVIII 38 . LXIX 69 . C 100 . VIII 8 . XXXIX 39 . LXX 70 . IX 9 . XL 40 . LXXI 71 . EX. . X 10 . XLI 41 . LXXII 72 . DI 501 . XI 11 . XLII 42 . LXXIII 73 . DL 550 . XII 12 . XLIII 43 . LXXIV 74 . DXXX 530 . XIII 13 . XLIV 44 . LXXV 75 . DCCVII 707 . XIV 14 . XLV 45 . LXXVI 76 . DCCCXC 890 . XV 15 . XLVI 46 . LXXVII 77 . MD 1500 . XVI 16 . XLVII 47 . LXXVIII 78 . MDCCC 1800 . XVII 17 . XLVIII 48 . LXXIX 79 . CM 900 . XVIII 18 . XLIX 49 . LXXX 80 . XIX 19 . L 50 . LXXXI 81 . XX 20 . LI 51 . LXXXII 82 . XXI 21 . LII 52 . LXXXIII 83 . XXII 22 . LIII 53 . LXXXIV 84 . XXIII 23 . LIV 54 . LXXXV 85 . XXIV 24 . LV 55 . LXXXVI 86 . XXV 25 . LVI 56 . LXXXVII 87 . XXVI 26 . LVII 57 . LXXXVIII 88 . XXVII 27 . LVIII 58 . LXXXIX 89 . XXVIII 28 . LIX 59 . XC 90 . XXIX 29 . LX 60 . XCI 91 . XXX 30 . LXI 61 . XCII 92 . XXXI 31 . LXII 62 . XCIII 93 ( Full Answer )
The date 1st May 2005 can also be written as 01-05-2005 and in Roman numerals this would be I.V.MMV
Today's modern conversion of 25-5-98 into Roman numerals is XXV-V-XCVIII . But the Romans themselves would have probably chosen XXV-V-LXXXXVIII which can be simplified to XXV-V-IIC.
I-IV-VIIC answer: 93 is XCIII (You can only "subtract" one digit/letter, so XC is 90.)
In today's terms the Roman numerals from 25 to 500 are as follows: Units from 1 to 9: I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX Tens from 10 to 90: X, XX, XXX, XL, L, LX, LXX. LXXX, XC Hundreds from 100 to 500: C, CC, CCC, CD, D To select a number simply write down the hundreds first followed by the …tens and units or if need be the tens first followed by thr units. Examples: 479 = CD+LXX+IX = CDLXXIX and 28 = XX+VIII = XXVIII ( Full Answer )
Well, of course they did-clue's kind of in the title 'ROMAN NUMERALS' Additional answer The questioner asked How not Whether they invested them
One is I in Roman numerals. This is two II , but four is IV , V is five, and six is VI.
1-I,2-II,3-III,4-IV,5-V,6-VI,7-VII,8-VIII,9-IX,10-X,.........20-XX,......50-L.......90-CX....100-C......500-D.....1000-M.That's all I know.But remember roman numerals like I, X, C and, M can't repeat more than 3 times. Improved Answer: In Roman numerals V, L, and D are used only once in row wh…ile I, X and C can be used four times in a row proof of this can be seen in the Roman numerals for 1999 which in its additional format are MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII. Glance at any watch or clock face that have Roman numerals embellished on them and invariably you'll notice that the fourth hour is given as IIII. Furthermore, in the ruins of the Coliseum in Rome, the number 29 is inscribed in stone as XXVIIII. 1999 is MIM nowadays, most of the 1900s were MCM.... ( Full Answer )
Since .25 is the same as 1/4th you can write this as: I/IV Improved Answer:- 0.25 = :. = 3/12 as a fraction in Roman numeracy and 0.5 = S = 6/12 as a fraction in Roman numeracy
X*LXXV = DCCL X*LXXV = DCCL V*LXXV = CCCLXXV When added together: MDCCCLXXV (75*25 = 1875)
I don't know how Romans would have written dates of birth but written the same way as you have, it would be: XI I MCMLXXXIII
Roman numerals were common up until the 14th century. However, the Hindu-Arabic system, which replaced it, was first introduced in the 10th century, and was derived from the Indian numeral system first used in the 5th century. The Roman system started in around 400 BC but the system we use today did…n't arrive until the 1st century AD (albeit without subtractive notation such as IV). There have been other numeral systems, including positional notation systems, that pre-date the Romans, as far back as 1,500 BC. ( Full Answer )
I suspect this question was taken from copywritten material, which is not allowed. Otherwise, you left out some crucial information.
15 becomes XV. 19 becomes XIX 25 becomes XXV 49 becomes IL 59 becomes LIX === 167 becomes CLXVII Improved Answer:- The way in which we write out Roman numerals today differs in the way that the Romans actually did themselves. For example today we would write out 19 as XIX but the Rom…ans probably wrote it out as IXX because the Latin word for IXX is 'undeviginti' which means one from twenty. From ancient manuscripts and monuments there are clues out there to show that the Romans would have probably wrote out the equivalent of 15, 19, 25, 49 and 59 simply as XV, IXX, XXV, IL and ILX respectively which makes addition straightforward as follows:- XV+IXX = IXXXV (15+19 = 34) IXXXV+XXV = ILX (34+25 = 59) ILX+IL = IICX (59+49 = 108) IICX+ILX = CLXVII (108+59 = 167) Alternatively the Romans could have used an abacus counting device and calculated the above numerals in expanded format as:- XV+XVIIII = XXXIIII (15+19 = 34) XXXIIII+XXV = LVIIII (34+25 = 59) LVIIII+XXXXVIIII = CVIII (59+49 = 108) CVIII+LVIIII = CLXVII (108+59 = 167) ( Full Answer )
July is the seventh month and would be VII. The 1st is represented by I. And the year would be MCMXCII. So it would normally be shown as VII-I-MCMXCII.
In today's notation of Roman numerals it is: XXI-I-MCMXCIV But during the Roman era 1994 was notated as MDCCCCLXXXXIIII
Strange as it may seem but Roman numerals had nothing to do with the Romans because this form of numeracy was first concieved by the Etruscans who once ruled the Romans.
1-I 2-II 3-III 4-VI 5-V 6-VI 7-VII 8-VIII 9-IX 10-X 11-XI 12-XII 13-XIII 14-XIV 15-XV 16-XVI 17-XVII 18-XVIII 19-XIX 20-XX 21-XXI 22-XXII 23-XXIII 24-XXIV 25-XXV I got this answer from another website but 19 said IXX and to the best of my knowledge the… correct answer is XIX ( Full Answer )
We don't normally represent dates in Roman numerals, only the year. However, the following would be the literal equivalent: XXV VI MMIV
They didn't because it was the Etruscans who concieved this form of numeracy and they once ruled the Romans.
If you mean 25 and 100 they are XXV and C respectively If you mean 25,100 it is (XXV)C which means 1000*25+100 = 25,100
In todays notation of Roman numerals: IX-XXV-MCMXC Note that the ancient Romans probably wrote out 1990 simply as XMM (2000-10)
No where because this numeral system was created by the Etruscans who once ruled the Romans
They didn't because this numeracy system was conceived by the Etruscans who once ruled the Romans. First of all, let me note that the theory that Rome was ruled by the Etruscans has now been challenged. Its evidence base was flimsy and its key tenets were based on unproven assumptions. More recent …archaeological evidence suggests a different picture. The Roman numerals were devised by the Romans (or probably the Latins more in general), not the Etruscans. The Roman numerals were not derived from Etruscan numerals. Two systems were partially related, probably due to the fact that both of them were inspired by the Attic numerals of the Greeks. However, they two used different symbols. Etruscan numerals are still not fully understood just as the Etruscan language has not been fully deciphered due to the small number of recovered inscriptions. The Roman system, like that of many ancient peoples, originated from a tally system. The counting of entities was recorded by etching tally marks on wood. That is why 1 is I, 2 in II and 3 is III. The tallies were added to each other. Every five notches there was a different symbol, like á¶º for 5. This symbol was later inverted and became V. Later in time, all these special symbols were converted into letters of the Latin alphabet: X (10), L (50), C (100), D (50), M (1,000). Thus, 15 was XV, 20 was XX, 25 was XXV, 30 was XXX, 60 Was LX, 110 was CX, 150 was CL, 170 was CLXX, etc. The system was originally complicated. For example 8 was IIIIVIII. It was then simplified with an abbreviation; 8 became VIII. 23 was originally IIIIVIIIIXIIIIVIIIIXIII. Later it was abbreviated as XXIII. ( Full Answer )
The Romans used "Roman Numerals" the same way that we use our Arabic numerals. They were used for all things mathematical, accounting, adding, subtracting, etc. The difference was just in the writing of the numbers, such as V for a 5 or X for a 10.
It needs to be broken up by the parts of the date. It would be represented with XXV-III-MMIX.
Romans numerals are the number of the Romans. The were I (1) V (5) X (10) L (50) C (100) D (500) and M (1,00). Numbers were created by putting these letters together in a variety of orders.
For the same reason why we still use the Latin language andRoman numerals are the numerical aspect of it. . +++ . Roman numerals rarely used nowadays. They occur in publishingand in clock-making, but not otherwise because the Arabic system isfar simpler and lends itself readily to mathematics. The… Latinlanguage is far more common, many of its words surviving as theroots for many English, Italian and French words. ( Full Answer )