09 16 1961 in roman numerals?
Roman numerals are generally used for just years, not days or months.
9 people found this useful
Roman Numerals are what Romans used to use for numbers. Differentsymbols have different numeral values. For example, I = 1, V = 5,and X = 10. When these symbols are combined in different ways theother numbers are formed. There are several rules for the placementof the symbols. . You may place up to… 3 of the same symbol adjacent to each otherto indicate addition. For example: I = 1; II = 1+1 = 2; III = 1+1+1= 3. Note that IIII is not proper because you may have no more than3 of the same symbol in a row. . You may place a smaller symbol after a larger one to indicateaddition. For example: V = 5; VI = 5+1 = 6; VII = 5+1+1 = 7; VIII =5+1+1+1 = 8. Again VIIII would not be proper because there are 4 Isimmediately adjacent to each other. . You may place a smaller symbol immediately before a largersymbol to indicate subtraction. For example IV = 5-1 = 4; IX = 10-1= 9. The basic numerals are: I = 1 V = 5 X = 10 L = 50 C = 100 D = 500 M = 1000 If it has a line over it, it means multiply by 1000, like L, wouldbe 50,000 Some examples of correct Roman Numerals: III = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 IX = 10 - 1 = 9 XIV = 10 + 5 - 1 = 14 XXXII = 10 + 10 + 10 + 1 + 1 = 32 LXIX = 50 + 10 + 10 - 1 = 69 MMVIII = 1000 + 1000 + 5 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 2008 MMIX = 1000 + 1000 + 10 - 1 = 2009 Here are some of the roman numerals: 1-I 5-V 10-X 20-XX 30-XXX 40-XL 50-L 60-LX 70-LXX 80-LXXX 90-XC 100-C 200-CC 300-CCC 400-CD 500-D 600-DC 700-DCC 800-DCCC 900-CM 1,000-M The first few Roman numerals are: I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII,IX, X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII and so on. ( Full Answer )
Romans used Roman numerals as their form of numbers. Romans needed Roman Numerals because they needed numbers to count, tell time, and do other things in life that involved numbers. Roman numerals were used because they could all be scribed using a flat chisel i.e X I V M.
Roman numerals were the symbols developed by the Ancient Romans for counting and other numbering activities. The Romans used them because they developed them and that was what they knew. What do you use numbers for? They used them for the exact same things, instead of the kind of numbers we use, wh…ich are known as Arabic numerals. ( Full Answer )
the Romans did not knew the 1 2 3. so they used it for everything that involved numbers.
The Romans used Roman numerals because that was their way ofcalculating. Roman numerals are really very simple andstraightforward. For example, the I = 1, no problem there. ThreeI's - 3. C = 100, the Latin abbreviation for centum , M - 1000, theLatin abbreviation for mille. For us it takes a bit of …figuringout, but for the Romans it was simple; if a person could count, hecould read numbers. ( Full Answer )
I am assuming that you mean the date 09-09-07, in Roman numerals this would be IX.IX.VII and the full version of the date 09-09-2007 would be IX.IX.MMVII
XVI. X is 10, V is five, and I is one. add them together and your answer is 16 =)
The Arabic (0-9) number system did not reach Europe until about 900 AD. Roman numerals date back to 1000 years BC and were the marks made on tally sticks and in stone. Their style was influenced by the Etruscan number system. They were originally quite different symbols from those in use today. In t…he middle ages they were aligned to the closest modern roman alphabet equivalent shape. Roman numerals were not just confined to whole numbers, fractions were indicated by a series of dots, each number and pattern of dots meaning a different part of the whole. ( Full Answer )
The date 09-11-06 can be written in Roman numerals as IX.XI.VI. The full date 09-11-2006 would be IX.XI.MMVI
The date 16th October 2007 can also be writen as 16-10-2007 and this can be represented by the Roman numerals XVI.X.MMVII
Roman numerals.... 1 = I 2 = II 3 = III 4 = IV (or IIII on old clocks, watches and sundials) 5 = V 6 = VI 7 = VII 8 = VIII 9 = IX 10 = X 20 = XX 30 = XXX 40 = XL 50 = L 60 = LX 70 = LXX 80 = LXXX 90 = XC 100 = C 500 = D 1000 = M 2000 = MM 3000 = MMM After 3000 thousand are written by either placing… a horizontal bar over a numeral, to indicate that the numeral should be multiplied by 1000, or by placing the numeral inside brackets, which also indicates that it should be multiplied by 1000. Examples... 4000 = [IV] 10000 = [X] 523000 = [DXXIII] 1000000 = [M] The numbers 11 - 19 and 21 - 29 etc follow the same pattern as the numbers 1 to 9 but preceeded by X or XX etc. The same applies to numbers preceeded by 100s or 1000s. Some examples... 14 = XIV 44 = XLIV 88 = LXXXVIII 151 = CLI 423 = CDXXIII 666 = DCLXVI 1066 = MLXVI 2009 = MMIX ( Full Answer )
the romans used roman numerals like we use numbers but not as many people could write.
The date 09-08-85 in Roman numerals would be IX.VIII.LXXXV and the full version of the date 09-08-1985 would be IX.VIII.MCMLXXXV
Roman numerals are a numeral system of ancient Rome based on letters of the alphabet, which are combined to signify the sum of their values.
The creation of roman numerals was a long one. As the Roman empire developed they needed a method to count that was more than 10 fingers so they developed a system using the hand with numeric symbols. An example of this would be I stood for a single finger while V was for the whole hand, and X for b…oth hands. Trade required a means of math and so did the construction of roads and buildings. So, there is no exact date that can be given for this development. ( Full Answer )
What is 02 06 09 in roman numerals its the date i got married and would like it tattoed on my wrist?
\nThe Roman numerals for 2, 6 and 9 are: \n. \nII VI IX \n. \nSo far as I know, there is no roman numeral for zero.
Virtually all numbers can be made from various combinations of the 7 Roman numerals. I (1) V (5) X (10) L (50) C (100) D (500) and M (1000). -- further -- Adding a bar above any of the standard numerals (other than i) had the effect of multiplying that numeral's value by 1,000, so that a v w…ith a bar above it is 5,000 and an m with a bar is ( Full Answer )
The date 9-9-09 in Roman numerals is IX.IX.IX. If the numbers represent the date 09-09-2009 that would be IX.IX.MMIX
Strictly speaking we should refer to Roman numerals as Etruscan numerals because it was the Etruscans who conceived the idea of numerals in the first place. The Etruscans once ruled the Romans and the Romans copied their counting system off them with modifications.
The conventional conversion of 7-16-2009 into Roman numerals is: VII-XVI-MMIX. . However, the Romans themselves would have enscribed 2009 as MMVIIII. . The rules governing the subtractive element of their numeracy system were introduced in the Middle Ages long after the decline of the Roman empire…. ( Full Answer )
The Roman numeral system was used during ancient Roman times, butuse of the system continued long after the Roman empire declined.In the 14th century, Roman numerals were slowly replaced byHindu-Arabic numbers.
13 = xiii 14 = xiv 15 = xv 16 = xvi 17 = xvii 18 = iixx 19 = ixx 20 = xx (capital for all)
In Roman numerals 08 would be VIII, 29 would be XXIX and 09 would be IX. If you are asking about a date... 08-29-2009 that would be VIII.XXIX.MMIX
In today's terms 06 09 98 converted into Roman numerals is VI-IX-XCVIII. The Romans themselves would have probably wrote out these numerals in additional notation as VI-VIIII-LXXXXVIII.
In today's terms 1-16-1988 converted into Roman numerals is I-XVI-MCMLXXXVIII. But during the times of the Romans themselves they would have probably wrote out the number 1988 as MDCCCCLXXXVIII.
1x/vii/mmix Another answer: IX-VII-MMIX though the Romans themselves would have probably wrote it out as VIIII-VII-MMVIIII.
In today's terms 09-16-1993 expressed in Roman numerals is IX-XVI-MCMXCIII. However, during the Roman era the Romans themselves would have probably wrote out these numbers as VIIII-XVI-MDCCCCLXXXXIII.
In today's terms it is: IV-XXIX-IX But the Romans themselves would have probably wrote out these numbers as: IIII-XXVIIII-VIIII. Evidence of this can be found in the ruins of the Coliseum in Rome.
Well, of course they did-clue's kind of in the title 'ROMAN NUMERALS' Additional answer The questioner asked How not Whether they invested them
One is I in Roman numerals. This is two II , but four is IV , V is five, and six is VI.
16 is XVI 11(November) is XI 2006 is MMVI the full date is XIV XI MMVI Improved Answer: November 16 2006 in Roman numerals is: November XVI MMVI or as XI XVI MMVI
Now I'm not sure about the zero, but it's IX VIII I IX VII IV. Was I of any help?
I suspect this question was taken from copywritten material, which is not allowed. Otherwise, you left out some crucial information.
They are as follows:- Method one XV+XVI = XXXI (15)+(16) = (31) XXXI+XVII = XLVIII (31)+(17) = (58-10) XLVIII+IIXX = LXVI (58-10)+(20-2) = (66) Method two XV+XVI = XXXI (15)+(16) = (31) XXXI+XVII = XXXXVIII (31)+(17) = (48) XXXXVIII+XVIII = LXVI (48)+(18) = (66) Note that for more com…plicated calculations the Romans would have made use of an abacus counting mechanism which today is equivalent to a calculator. QED ( Full Answer )
In today's terms: IX-XIX-MMXI Note that in the past the Romans would have calculated 19 as XVIIII which they then probably abridged it to IXX in written form.
They didn't because it was the Etruscans who concieved this form of numeracy and they once ruled the Romans.
In todays notation of Roman numerals: IX-XXV-MCMXC Note that the ancient Romans probably wrote out 1990 simply as XMM (2000-10)
In todays terms: X-XVI-MCMXC But the ancient Romans probably wrote out 1990 simply as XMM (2000-10)
No where because this numeral system was created by the Etruscans who once ruled the Romans
In todays terms: I-XVI-MCMLXXX but the ancient Romans probably wrote out the equivalent of 1980 quite differently
They didn't because this numeracy system was conceived by the Etruscans who once ruled the Romans. First of all, let me note that the theory that Rome was ruled by the Etruscans has now been challenged. Its evidence base was flimsy and its key tenets were based on unproven assumptions. More recent …archaeological evidence suggests a different picture. The Roman numerals were devised by the Romans (or probably the Latins more in general), not the Etruscans. The Roman numerals were not derived from Etruscan numerals. Two systems were partially related, probably due to the fact that both of them were inspired by the Attic numerals of the Greeks. However, they two used different symbols. Etruscan numerals are still not fully understood just as the Etruscan language has not been fully deciphered due to the small number of recovered inscriptions. The Roman system, like that of many ancient peoples, originated from a tally system. The counting of entities was recorded by etching tally marks on wood. That is why 1 is I, 2 in II and 3 is III. The tallies were added to each other. Every five notches there was a different symbol, like á¶º for 5. This symbol was later inverted and became V. Later in time, all these special symbols were converted into letters of the Latin alphabet: X (10), L (50), C (100), D (50), M (1,000). Thus, 15 was XV, 20 was XX, 25 was XXV, 30 was XXX, 60 Was LX, 110 was CX, 150 was CL, 170 was CLXX, etc. The system was originally complicated. For example 8 was IIIIVIII. It was then simplified with an abbreviation; 8 became VIII. 23 was originally IIIIVIIIIXIIIIVIIIIXIII. Later it was abbreviated as XXIII. ( Full Answer )
The Romans used "Roman Numerals" the same way that we use our Arabic numerals. They were used for all things mathematical, accounting, adding, subtracting, etc. The difference was just in the writing of the numbers, such as V for a 5 or X for a 10.
Romans numerals are the number of the Romans. The were I (1) V (5) X (10) L (50) C (100) D (500) and M (1,00). Numbers were created by putting these letters together in a variety of orders.
On Converting between Arabic date and Roman Numbers we get: . 07 in roman numerals is written as : VII . 09 in roman numerals is written as : IX . 2007 in roman numerals is written as : MMVII,where M=1000.
In todays modern usage of Roman numerals: VII-XVI-MDCCLXIX But the ancient Romans would have wrote out the equivalent of 1769 as MDCCLXVIIII
In todays modern configuration of Roman numerals: XI-XVI-MCMXCV Note that the ancient Romans would have wrote out the equivalent of 1995 quite differently
The Mike Douglas Show - 1961 - 1980-09-16 was released on: USA: 16 September 1980
For the same reason why we still use the Latin language andRoman numerals are the numerical aspect of it. . +++ . Roman numerals rarely used nowadays. They occur in publishingand in clock-making, but not otherwise because the Arabic system isfar simpler and lends itself readily to mathematics. The… Latinlanguage is far more common, many of its words surviving as theroots for many English, Italian and French words. ( Full Answer )
They are now: XII, XIV, XVI and CXII respectively but the ancient Romans would have probably wrote out the equivalent of 14 quite differently.
Roman numerals are the numerical element of the Latin language which is still spoken today and was the language spoken by the ancient Romans who once conquered most of the known world at the time.