According to the Fifth Amendment, a person accused of a crime is entitled to due process of law.
A person accused of a crime did not come from Roman Law of Nations.
No the term litigant applies almost exclusively to civil law or tort cases. The individual accused of a crime is known as the defendant.
A jury or court finds that the accused is not guilty, in reality the accused may not innocent.
No, arrestees are 'booked' at the law enforcement agency which arrested them.
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states in part, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law,..."
i believe that its the witnesses choice wheather they want to see the person they accused of a crime, if the accused refuses it then that is there choice it should not be against the law not to allow a witness to see the accused.
how did roman law protect the rights of an accused person?
It depends on the legislation of the country involved.
Due Process of Law.
Accused
Had the right to face the accuser and offer a defense.
3