Of course not! The whole purpose of an amendment is to change the Constitution! If we don't like what it says, or how the Supreme Court is interpretting it, we, the people, have the right to change the document.
No. The Supreme Court would be violating their constitutional separation of powers if they tried to block a new amendment to the Constitution. Even if this were possible, allowing the Court that much control over how the document is amended would afford them far too much control of government.
Article V dictates a proposed amendment must receive a two-thirds vote of both the Senate and House of Representatives and ratification of seventy-five percent of the States. This process is designed to minimize the possibility of "unconstitutional" amendments becoming part of the Constitution.
No
federal court
Unconstitutional
Judicial review is the power to declare a government action that violates some provisions of the constitution to be null and void. This is as a result of the action being in contravention with the provisions of the constitution.
According to their constitution they do have rights. However, Chavez rules as a dictator and routinely violates constitutional rights.
No, this violates the first amendment of US Constitution, we should have the right of freedom of expressions.
Any practice or law that violates the constitution is unconstitutional.
It violates the 1st amendment.
Private prayer in school is allowed under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Institutional prayer is forbidden under the same amendment--freedom of religion is to be respected, and there should be no governmental establishment of religion.
Yes. There have been many examples of this over the years; a recent case in the news is the lawsuit filed against the state of California alleging that the ban on same-sex marriages violates citizens' rights under the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.
No
violates 8th amendment
Contrary to internet myth, the president has not violated the constitution.
To go against the constitution.
its said to be unconstitutional
Courts
Courts