the answer is hypothesis
A "hypothesis".
A hypothesis.
hypothesis
There is no such thing as "scientific method for hypertension". The scientific method is a process, utilization of which leads to rational, testable explanations for natural phenomena. Hypertension is an ailment.
True scientific models must all lead to testable hypotheses; otherwise, they are unverifiable and not so different than speculation. Note that some scientific models may not be testable at the time they are proposed if the technology of that time is not available to conduct proper tests. Sometimes, the work that goes into figuring out ways of testing new hypotheses leads to the invention of new instruments or the design of new machines that can end up having benefits greater than what they were originally designed for.
True scientific models must all lead to testable hypotheses; otherwise, they are unverifiable and not so different than speculation. Note that some scientific models may not be testable at the time they are proposed if the technology of that time is not available to conduct proper tests. Sometimes, the work that goes into figuring out ways of testing new hypotheses leads to the invention of new instruments or the design of new machines that can end up having benefits greater than what they were originally designed for.
A hypothesis (hie-poth-uh-sis) is a testable idea that leads to scientific explanation In other words its what you think is going to happen in your experiment before you actually start it.
Clutter leads to accidents, and accidents can ruin the experiment.
It leads to the process of the scientific theory. :)
This is the Object of The Scientific Experiment.The object of the scientific experiment is to measure the Cause of the Event under Study.This is accomplished by the "Isolation" of this object-of-study from any and all sources of any and all forms of interferential influences of any and all types.This [ONLY] leads to a Result that is uncontestable in it's Adjudication.
When an experiment contradicts the outcome predicted by a theory, the theory is said to be a failure. The experiment itself, if poorly designed or conducted, may not achieve a result to distinguish between expected outcomes, in which case the experiment would be a failure. Even negative results in science have meaning. Failure generally leads to greater insight than does success, as flaws is theory reveal the need for improved theories.
The process of companies is to identify the experiment in which the production leads to you getting laid.