no, not usually, but some countries require additional testing which may include animals, but only under the supervision of the department of health in that country, (not the U.S or Europe)
The finished products are not tested on animals.
some are i guess
You can... However, I wouldn't. If it says not tested on animals, I definitly wouldn't. Something you can use for your Guinea Pig is the Dawn dish detergent stuff. Just put a little in the palm of your hand and it will work great.
It will say on the bottle or website if it is NOT tested on animals. If it doesnt say anything it probably is tested on animals
Carmex lip balm is not tested on animals.
Around 73 animals get tested on a day
Yes, the Issey Miyake perfumes are usually tested on animals. Just like the other types of perfumes, they have to be tested on the animals first.
The claims of the manufactures of the Kerastese shampoo are that the product is never tested on animals. Even though there is advertisement that says the shampoo is just a big chemical mix of products that have never been tested on animals or people for that matter
Absolutely no KMS products are tested on animals. They strongly believe against animal testing.
Alterna Hemp shampoo does not containt any animal ingredients
Yes, Batiste is owned by Church & Dwight, a company which tests its products on animals.
lots of things like shampoo,medicane,hairspary and much more
they are animals that have undergone an experiment like having shampoo in their eyes to see if it hurts or forced to drink pesticides to see what the effects are
shampoo,pesticides,disease cures,cloning,toothpaste etc. all of this has been tested to see if it is safe on animals before it is sold to humans, thousands of animals have to undergo alot of pain,stress and suffering from having these products tested on them before they are aloud to be sold to consumers
In my opinion no. i believe that animals should be treated as equals compared to humans. Some companies test shampoo on animals but why not humans? i think they believe that if something happens to the tested animal i.e. rash then they can improve the shampoo but if a human is tested then they get a rash or infection, then they coiuld get the company in trouble, but that is just my opinion
According to Amazon.com, Aussie products are not tested on animals, but other websites claim (though without sources apart from their own opinions), that Aussie products are tested on animals, since Aussie is owned by Proctor and Gamble, a company that formally supports animal testing.
1. Shampoo 2. Conditioner 3. Baby products 4. Soap 5. Lotion 6. Etc.
probably even shampoo says they sometimes use animal testing normally lower brands
I am HIGHLY against animal testing but as all thing there are pro's and con's...... If people tested shampoo on humans and it was poisonous then that person might die. If an animal tested shampoo then that a loss, but there are LOADS of different types/breeds of animals and it wont affect the world that bad.