You should get you a lawyer an deverytime your grandmother try to get your childern, you record it. Then you take it to court.
to protect them against disease / illnesses .
they moved against the red coats because they wanted to protect there land and protect there wives and children. More specifically, the British army were marching to seize the gunpowder of the Concord Local Militia.
It Prevents, Investigates, Prosecutes and punishes violent crimes committed against children.
It Prevents, Investigates, Prosecutes and punishes violent crimes committed against children.
It could be said the same thing as when a father does, but fathers left behind with the children have a bad habit of doing nothing. They don't file for custody or child support. They sit and hope she comes back, but far to frequently when they do, it's only to get possession of the children, than file against the father. Dads need to learn to protect themselves and their children. the mom has one less thorn in the side to deal with
The Children's Act aims to safeguard and promote the welfare of children by setting out their rights and protections. It establishes key principles to guide all agencies and individuals who work with children, ensuring their safety, well-being, and best interests are prioritized in decisions and actions that affect them. The Act also provides a framework for interventions in cases of abuse, neglect, or other risks to children's welfare, emphasizing the importance of promoting their physical, emotional, and social development.
No, birth control pills DO NOT protect against HIV
The T cells help protect the body against viruses.
When a parent does not have court ordered custody papers..any parent can have thr chilld...EX if the father takes him and doesn't want to return them well there is nothing you can do...if you call the police..they want a copy of the court ordered custody papers to remove the child from the non custodial parent....protect yourself get court ordered papers....my children were take by their father...i had no choice but to wait it out till he decided to return them...I did not have custody papers and nothing could be done since he was the father
Usually people who argue against laws to protect children are the ones who are not wanting to stop the action that is harming the child or the fear of being caught. Such as driving with no child restraints? Who would argue against that? Or no smoking in the auto while a child is in the car? I would only argue that if I was smoking with the child in the car. So if your question is about those types of arguments, then I feel my answer is correct. If your question is not about those types of laws to protect children, could you be more specific? please. Often people argue againt some laws because they understand that each law that is passed removes individual rights. Also, laws purported to protect children may not be sensible in all cases, but the laws are enforced universally.
Being gay is not a reason to "protect children". Unless there is another reason you need to protect your children from your spouse, the answer is that you need more help than your spouse does.
it cant protect the system against power surges