any age
Rats and huemans
yes cancer
Absolutely
It's like any other disease. It never really went away.
Actually the plague in Shakespeare's time was not the Bubonic Plague but the Pneumonic Plague which affected the respiratory as opposed to the lymphatic system. Several people Shakespeare knew, including his sister Anne died of it. It also had the effect of closing down theatres in London when there was an outbreak. During one particularly long outbreak Shakespeare, who did not belong to any particular acting company at the time, made some cash by selling his narrative poem Venus and Adonis. It was very popular and enhanced his reputation as a writer.
It killed him the same as any one else. The chances were beter for him however because the conditions he lived in were better.
Yes there were many plagues in the history of the Roman Empire. However, in those days the term plague referred to any pandemic. The worst ones were the Antonine Plague (165-180), which is thought to have been an outbreak of smallpox or measles, and the Plague of Justinian (541-542), which was actually an outbreak of bubonic plague.
I thing no.Ebola it is transmitted from blood of infected person or with any secretions of the infected person.Yersian pestis it is the agent causative of bubonioc plague and can be wildly spreed thought air.
Shakespeare faced many challenges. He faced the Bubonic plague, and a lack of money. He also had a lot of criticism.
The Black Death was a specific outbreak of the bubonic plague in the midieval time period. The most important animals carrying the bubonic plague were rats and the fleas of the species Xenopsylla cheopis that they carry. These animals were killed by the plague quite as effectively as human beings were, and the disease disappeared when it had killed off nearly all of the rats and fleas. In any given area, the plague usually ended after a period of a few months.
Plague was a common health concern in the ancient world, in particular the urban areas. Wheather is was actual bubonic plague is a matter of speculation as many of the ancient writers used the word "plague" for any contageous disease. Rome itself, however, was subject to periodioc bouts of plague. It was one of the reasons that the emperors and the wealthy left the city in the summers.Plague was a common health concern in the ancient world, in particular the urban areas. Wheather is was actual bubonic plague is a matter of speculation as many of the ancient writers used the word "plague" for any contageous disease. Rome itself, however, was subject to periodioc bouts of plague. It was one of the reasons that the emperors and the wealthy left the city in the summers.Plague was a common health concern in the ancient world, in particular the urban areas. Wheather is was actual bubonic plague is a matter of speculation as many of the ancient writers used the word "plague" for any contageous disease. Rome itself, however, was subject to periodioc bouts of plague. It was one of the reasons that the emperors and the wealthy left the city in the summers.Plague was a common health concern in the ancient world, in particular the urban areas. Wheather is was actual bubonic plague is a matter of speculation as many of the ancient writers used the word "plague" for any contageous disease. Rome itself, however, was subject to periodioc bouts of plague. It was one of the reasons that the emperors and the wealthy left the city in the summers.Plague was a common health concern in the ancient world, in particular the urban areas. Wheather is was actual bubonic plague is a matter of speculation as many of the ancient writers used the word "plague" for any contageous disease. Rome itself, however, was subject to periodioc bouts of plague. It was one of the reasons that the emperors and the wealthy left the city in the summers.Plague was a common health concern in the ancient world, in particular the urban areas. Wheather is was actual bubonic plague is a matter of speculation as many of the ancient writers used the word "plague" for any contageous disease. Rome itself, however, was subject to periodioc bouts of plague. It was one of the reasons that the emperors and the wealthy left the city in the summers.Plague was a common health concern in the ancient world, in particular the urban areas. Wheather is was actual bubonic plague is a matter of speculation as many of the ancient writers used the word "plague" for any contageous disease. Rome itself, however, was subject to periodioc bouts of plague. It was one of the reasons that the emperors and the wealthy left the city in the summers.Plague was a common health concern in the ancient world, in particular the urban areas. Wheather is was actual bubonic plague is a matter of speculation as many of the ancient writers used the word "plague" for any contageous disease. Rome itself, however, was subject to periodioc bouts of plague. It was one of the reasons that the emperors and the wealthy left the city in the summers.Plague was a common health concern in the ancient world, in particular the urban areas. Wheather is was actual bubonic plague is a matter of speculation as many of the ancient writers used the word "plague" for any contageous disease. Rome itself, however, was subject to periodioc bouts of plague. It was one of the reasons that the emperors and the wealthy left the city in the summers.