In almost all cases, no. You would not be guilty, but if you saw what happened, you are a witness.
Another View: The above is true only if you were truly an un-involved witness who just happened to be at the scene when the crime went down.
HOWEVER - if you were there accompanying the person or persons who committed the offense, YES - you could be charged as an accessory.
The scene of the crime is the physical location where the actual offense took place.A crime scene is any location where evidence of the crime exists or can be found.The two phrases, although often used inter-changeably, are NOT the same thing.
in my idea detective or police officer are responsible in crime i mean the role of a detective is so important, he goes to the crime scene,searches foe the clues and evidences,talks to the witnesses and finally he can say who ia guilty?
Not necessarily DNA match could mean the person was there before but it does not necessarily mean they were part of the crime
primary crime scene
Nothing
The primary crime scene is the place where a crime was first committed.
A crime scene investigator analyzes evidence from a crime scene. A detective does show up to the crime scene. They just cant touch evidence.
Crime scene Vehicle along with all essential crime scene Investigation boxes.
Who committed the crime is usually unknown in a crime scene and has to be proven with evidence.
The primary crime scene is the place where a crime was first committed.
Jodi Ann Arias was born on July 9, 1980, in Salinas, California. She killed her boyfriend Alexander Trevis and left a messy crime scene. She was charged and later became guilty of her crime.
Crime Scene Investigation orCrime Scene Investigators