You can, but I wouldn't. Ask them if they were cheating. If not, then say nothing.
It is cheating if you are being tested on your ownknowledge of a subject.
Dna from each suspected father and the baby.
yes, there could be big health risks if you did not, for you and him
Testing athletes helps to determine if they are cheating. They are cheating by creating an uneven playing environment against their competitors.
A child suspected to have apraxia should first have his or her hearing tested to determine if the child has any deafness. Muscle development in the face and jaw should be evaluated and speech exercises tested. Articulation of words should be tested.
It could be a urinary tract infection, it needs to be tested by a doctor. If pregnancy is suspected it probably has nothing to do with cloudy urine, but can also be tested at the same time as testing for a UTI.
An example of one's integrity being tested would be someone accusing them of cheating on their spouse. The person accusing has no proof, but is trying to set them up. The way this could be handled is to find proof that the accusations are false and the person is trying to set you up for whatever reason. Confront the person, they will most like slip up.
Just because you are exposed to HIV doesn't mean you will get the virus. You should be tested now after 6 months (180 days) to be sure you don't have the virus.
If you tested negative at 6 months after suspected exposure, it isn't likely you will test positive in the future unless you have been re-exposed.
No. There is an incubation period. That is why you should get tested every 3 months for an entire year after suspected exposure. Really, it would not hurt to get tested immediately after the potential exposure as well in case you contracted it before then.
I tested the ignitor for my '86 vulcan 750 and as I suspected it showed bad. I followed the info in my service manual.
The testing for herpes should occur when you have a suspected outbreak. Any earlier and the results will simply be inconclusive.