Yes. Most employees are at-will meaning they can be fired at any time for any or no reason. Electronic defamation is actually a very good reason. Contract employees are subject to the terms of their contract - but electronic defamation is probably covered as an acceptable reason for termination.
When the employees believes that the reference provided by the employer was not true and resulted in defamation of the employee
When the employees believes that the reference provided by the employer was not true and resulted in defamation of the employee
It isn't a very smart thing for an employer, or ex-employer to do as far as customer relations are concerned, unless the information is couched in terms which don't identify the employee in any way; the employer could say, we're sorry there have been a few problems, but we've taken immediate steps to ensure it doesn't happen again. To do otherwise simply reflects badly on the workplace and management. If the hotel owner is lying to guests about the reasons for firing an employee, and either naming the employee or making it clear who they're talking about, there could well be a case for defamation. You'd have to prove defamation exists. The relevant union might be the former employee's first place of reference, or legal aid. Privacy legislation, as well as industrial law, would also be involved here.
Informal monitoring is when a employer is making subtle judgment about how an employee is fitting into a workplace or noticing if that employee has difficulties.
I An employer violates no law by publicizing true facts about you. An employer commits defamation by publicizing falsehoods about you. You can sue only if you can show dollar damages.
If an employee is injured while performing work for the employer outside the workplace, then the injury should be reported.
Truth is an affirmative defense to any claim of defamation. If the employee was, in fact, stealing from other clients, barring any contract or local law stating otherwise, the employer is completely within their rights to do this.
The employer is always responsible to ensure employees receive training on every hazard in the workplace.
An employee's action during work time are at the discretion of the company
Certainly. An employer has no liability for defamation unless it broadcasts falsehoods about a person. Broadcasting facts about an employee's firing violates no law.
The specifics depend on which country you are talking about, but basically the employer is responsible for providing a safety and healthful workplace and the employee is responsible for working safely and participating actively in the safety process. How the law applies specifically to employer and employee is different in different countries.
The employee's criticism of the employer