good points it can help make different parts of the body like heart or kigneys to save peopl's life
Ian Wilmut did not call cloning cloning. He was the professor that had cloned Dolly (Andrew) the sheep. Johnny
Cloning is a type of asexual reproduction.
When a clone is made without the use of artificial cloning. Natural cloning: Twins, mitosis, asexual reproduction Artificial cloning: SCNT, therepuetic + reproductive cloning.
Cloning is controlled because of opposition by people of religion. They say that cloning is wrong, and that we should not be tampering with life.
Its bad because it's unnatural. But so are polio vaccines! Cloning parts for people to save their lives could be a good thing!
Its bad because it's unnatural. But so are polio vaccines! Cloning parts for people to save their lives could be a good thing!
Yes, they save lives.
Yes, they save lives.
The idea is to clone a part of a human. So if you need a new liver, a liver could be cloned from your DNA, making it the perfect donor. You wouldn't actually clone a whole human.
Toast can most definitely save lives; lives of starving families.
Some cons to cloning are that you would be like eating fake or artificial food and meat. Additional Info: Short lives, and different personalities.
well of course...imagine there are people who need transplants but there just isn't one out there, if we could take their tissue and clone a healthy heart or lung or arm or w.e they need then we could save thousands of lives
They can save lives by making sure it doesn't erupt
How many lives did Albert Schweitzer save?
If we live in peace and have no war and live a dignified live we can save many lives
This is an ethical question and is based on personal opinions.There are many types of cloning and two of them are reproductive and therapeutic. Usually when people think that cloning is ethically right, they are mostly focusing on therapeutic cloning which is only creating a whole new single body part from a single cell. People who generally think that cloning is wrong are focusing more on the reproductive cloning which creates an entirely new organism.Both sides have their pros and cons. For example, therapeutic can create new body parts for a sick person and save their lives, using the same person's cells. But reproductive cloning may cause many problems such as people have too similar DNA and letting new diseases arise.My personal opinion is that cloning should be allowed for therapeutic reasons only but should be controlled so the research does not get out of control. If people were able to learn how to clone someone or something, this could cause multiple issues for humans and other species.