No. The head of the British government is the Prime Minister. The Queen is head of state and her functions are largely formal and ceremonial. ------------------------- Note that England does not have a devolved government.
It is unlikely.
By convention, the Prime Minister must serve in Parliament's lower house, the House of Commons. The Sovereign of the United Kingdom (not England) may not even enter the House of Commons because that body has the right to debate independently. Nor may the Sovereign vote.
The Prime Minister is the person whom the Sovereign believes has the best chance of forming a government, and is therefore, usually, the head of the majority party. The Prime Minister is the subject of, and, at least symbolically, serves the Sovereign. It is difficult to imagine that a person could fulfill the constitutional duties as the Head of State and Head of Government at the same time without conflict.
The current Queen, Elizabeth II, however, could always resign as Sovereign and then run for Parliament.
There has not been a Queen (or King) of England for over 300 years.
England is a part of, but not the same as, The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
The Queen is the head of state the United Kingdom but has no power or influence in creating laws or the day to day running of the state.
This falls to the Prime Minister who is currently David Cameron. He leads the government which is formed by whomever can attain a majority in the House of Commons, the lower house of the UK's legislature.
The Queen however formally calls General Elections and invites people to form Governments and become Prime Minister. However she does this under the instruction of sitting Prime Minister and established conventions.
The Queen only has ceremonial powers. All the real power is with the government.
A queen is the head of state in a country like Canada.
The country of Italy no longer has a king or a queen as the head of the country , it has a president, who is elected.
she is head of state in command of country and commonwealth
king or a queen is the head of the state and or country
It is Queen Elizabeth II
Whereas the Prime Minister is Head of the Government, the Queen is Head of State. Technically the PM gets on with running the country whilst the Queen represents the country/nation at engagements, state visits, investitures, etc. If we did get rid of the Queen we still need a Head of State, probably a President. Many presidents are no more than figureheads (like the Queen).
No. Although it is a democracy, Denmark is a kingdom and has a queen at its head.
no he wasn't, the head of the Protestant church was the King or Queen of the country
It depends on the country. In the USA, the President is the Head of State-- this means he is the person who is the leader of our government. But in a country that has a King or Queen (a monarchy), the leader may actually be the Prime Minister (the head of Parliament) while the King or Queen has the title of Head of State, but no longer has much power beyond the symbolic.
There is no mention of an official Head of State in the Australian Constitution. Most people have historically regarded Queen Elizabeth as the Head of State, however, in recent years, some people have argued that the Governor-General could also be the Head of State, since he or she now exercises almost all of the Queen's powers in Australia. From the way the Australian Constitution is written, it seems more likely that the Queen is the actual Head of State, since the Governor-General is officially the Queen's representative in Australia.
Australia is still a member of the British Commonwealth, and though an independent country, has retained Queen Elizabeth II as head of state.
The phrase "queen of monarch" is not grammatically correct. However, if you are referring to a queen who rules as the monarch of a country, it means that she holds the highest position of power in that country and is the head of state.