answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Your question refers to an instance when you write a check and include all information except the amount. When you leave the amount blank, you risk an overdraft on your account if the payee or your agent writes an amount that is greater than your account balance at the time of processing.

However, despite the potential loss to the bank or to the payee, you cannot be prosecuted for the crime of "writing a bad check" because there is no crime, here. Two necessary elements are the intent to defraud and the knowledge that there are insufficient funds in the account to cover the check. Simply go to the related link and read, on the opening page, the general description of the usual elements of a criminal bad-check law:

4. The intent to defraud and knowledge of insufficient funds [are] required . . . by most states' bad check laws. The intent to defraud is sufficient. It is not necessary for the payee to have actually been defrauded.

It is very important to understand that there is no criminal liability for simply bouncing a check. Without the intent to defraud, there is no criminal act. You had merely created the possibility that the check could be written for more than the amount in the account and certainly had no intention to defraud anyone.

However, you can be held liable in a civil suit, even if the written amount was not authorized, since you have created the possibility that this could happen. The person who wrote the larger amount would be primarily liable for any loss, and you, as the maker of the check, would be secondarily liable.

In your situation, leaving the amount blank would be deemed a civilly negligent act, rather than a criminal act; you cannot be prosecuted for a returned check.

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 2010-08-13 11:57:36
This answer is:
User Avatar
Study guides

selection process for all federal judges

appellate jurisdiction vs original jurisdiction in federal courts

how did the 14th amendment affect civil liberties in the united states

what term describes the view that only fundamental bill of rights protections should apply to the statesΒ 

➑️
See all cards
4.32
β˜†β˜…β˜†β˜…β˜†β˜…β˜†β˜…β˜†β˜…
25 Reviews

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can you be prosecuted for a returned check if you did not authorize the person to make it out for the amount that he did?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Can a person be prosecuted on a Returned check written eight years ago?

It is too late to prosecute.


What is the person who is being prosecuted called?

The person who is being prosecuted is called the defendant.


Finish the sentence hereby authorize?

I hereby authorize (name of a specific person), Attorney at Law, to be the Executor of my Will.I hereby authorize (name of a specific person) to withdraw $200 dollars from my bank account.


Can a person be prosecuted if they are dead?

Physically-Yes. By Law-No.


Who are the authorize personnel to interpret constitution?

Lily is the coolest person eva with a k


Should a person be prosecuted for espionage if they were spying for one of your allies?

learn how to spell


Who returned Jerusalem to Muslim control?

the person who returned was Ferdinand and queen Isabella


A person signed a contract on behalf of someone who did not have authority to do so?

That is illegal if the person did not have consent to sign on the person's behalf. That is considered forgery and can be prosecuted as such.


Why did President Wilson authorize repeated military interventions in the Americans?

cause hes a mean person


What is credit authorization?

It's a form you sign to authorize another person to view your credit report.


What is the definition of self-incrimination?

Self-incrimination is the act of accusing oneself of a crime for which a person can then be prosecuted.


If a murder is committed at sea IE in the middle of the Pacific can the person who committed the murder be prosecuted?

Yes.

People also asked