answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes. Here's why...

What we need to do is find five numbers out of which a combination of three can not be picked whose sum is divisible by three.

The easiest way to see whether or not that's possible is to look at all possible numbers as sets, grouped by their offsets from multiples of three. That gives us three sets:

a(x) = 3x + 0 = {0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 ... }

b(x) = 3x + 1 = {1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, ... }

c(x) = 3x + 2 = {2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, ...}

There are two important things to note here:

1) First, any three numbers selected from one of those sets will add up to a multiple of three. This can be demonstrated very easily. Let's take set C. We'll pick three random numbers out of the selection, calling them x, y, and z. Their sum then would be:

3x + 2 + 3y + 2 + 3z + 2

= 3x + 3y + 3z + 6

= 3(x + y + z + 2)

which means that all possible selections will be a multiple of three. Now let's try that with set B:

3x + 1 + 3y + 1 + 3z + 1

= 3(x + y + z + 1)

again, all answers are multiples of three.

This is most obvious with set A, where the results would be expressed simply as:

3x + 3y + 3z

= 3(x + y + z)

This means that in order for our set of five numbers to meet the conditions we want, no more than two can be picked out of any of those three sets.

2) The second important note to look at is that if we pick a random number out of each of those sets, and add them together, they too will add up to a multiple of three. Here's the proof, again with our three random selections of (x, y, z):

a(x) + b(y) + c(z)

= 3x + 0 + 3y + 1 + 3z + 2

= 3x + 3y + 3z + 3

= 3(x + y + z + 1)

This means that we can't pick a number out of all three sets. Otherwise, a sum that's divisible by three can be found.

Now consider these facts together:

  1. we have three sets that include every possible number that we can select
  2. we can pick at most two numbers out of each of those sets
  3. we can pick numbers out of at most two of those sets

These conditions can not be met if we want to pick five numbers. We can find four that meet this condition (a pair out of any two of the sets), but if we want to pick a fifth one, it must either come from the third set, breaking our limit of two sets, or from one of the ones we've already picked from, breaking our limit of two per set.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can you guarantee that if you have a group of five numbers you can pick out three that will add up to a multiple of 3?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Can you guarantee that it is always possible to choose three numbers that will add up to a multiple of three from any set of five positive whole numbers?

no because first of all you should have said differentpositive whole #s because now i can say 1*1*1=1 which is not a multiple of 3but assuming they are different it is still a no because 2*1*5=10 which is not a multiple of 3


Which is the smallest number - a multiple of more than two numbers?

4 is a multiple of three numbers.


Why 35 and 7 are the only three consecutive odd prime numbers?

If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.


What is a group of 3 digits separated by commas in a multiple number?

Commas are used to separate large numbers into groups of three digits. Each group is called a period.


Divide the face of the clock into three parts with 2 lines so that the sum of the numbers in the three parts is equal?

You group the numbers 11,12,1,2.Then you group the numbers 10,9,3,4.last you group the numbers 8,7,6,5.


What are three consecutive numbers that add up to 68?

There are no such whole numbers. The sum of three consecutive whole numbers must be a multiple of 3; as 68 is not a multiple of 3 (68 = 3 × 22 2/3) it cannot be the sum of three whole numbers.


The sum of three consecutive numbers is always?

A multiple of 3 Also a multiple of 6.


What are the three consecutive numbers with the sum 175?

For this to be possible with whole numbers, 175 has to be a multiple of three. It's not, it isn't.


What numbers are multiple to three?

3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,27,30,33,36,39,42,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,80,83,86,89,92, 95,98 and 101 They are all the numbers I know. XD


Least common multiple of three or more numbers?

These do exist.


How many three digit numbers are a multiple of 7?

128


What r the 3 numbers that have 2 4 and 8 as factors?

Calculate the least common multiple of the three numbers. Any multiple of that has all those numbers as factors.