It would be highly unlikely that any commonly employed diagnostic HIV test could ever be used to detected infection just 2 days after exposure.
The rapid HIV antibody test - which is the test commonly used for routine bedside diagnostic testing of HIV in adults - tests for HIV antibodies ... most people will develop detectable antibodies within two to six weeks of infection, although some seroconvert later (99% will have detectable antibodies within three months of HIV infection).
The ELISA test (which is the most commonly used test to detect HIV infection in laboratories), is far more sensitive and can potentially detect possible HIV infections at a much earlier stage; but the problem with this test is that it can be difficult to determine a cut-off point between a definite positive and definite negative result, which sometimes results in problematic results that need further testing and follow-up samples.
It would be highly unlikely. The HIV antibody test - which is the test commonly used for routine diagnostic testing of HIV in adults - tests for HIV antibodies .. most people will develop detectable antibodies within two to six weeks of infection, although some seroconvert later (99% will have detectable antibodies within three months of HIV infection).
Yes you can. I went for an hiv rapid finger stick test which came out negative =) But they take blood/urine samples to test for chlamydia gonnorhea and syphilis as well as hiv and you can get your results within 10 days. Say you had sex today. (May 5. 2009) unprotected with a possibly hiv infected partner you get tested on may 15, 2009. The test can confirm if you are indeed infected with hiv or not. The test looks for the actual virus 10 days and prior. So wait 10 days then go get tested and you will get your results within 7 buisness days. The rapid hiv test only confirms if you are hiv + or - 3 months and prior I hope this helps and good luck.
It's highly doubtful that it would. The rule of thumb is 3 months but it should in most cases be detectable after 2 months.
No. A complicated test called PCR (viral load) can sometimes show infection but it si not licensed for HIV diagnosis.
It is too soon to get accurate results after 15 days.
HIV won't be detected 4 weeks after exposure.
HIV testing is a very sexually responsible behavior. When getting tested for the virus, the testing device doesnt test for HIV, it tests for HIV antibodies that the body produces in response to HIV infection. Receiving a negative antibody test is definitely encouraging, however there is a period of time when antibody tests are not able to detect infection. Antibodies can take up to 90 days to develop to detectable levels. If a person had any exposure to HIV+ fluids(blood, semen, vaginal fluid, breast milk) within the 90 days prior to testing, the HIV test would not be accurate.
If you get a generalized rash within weeks of possible HIV exposure, early diagnosis and treatment are important. While the standard antibody test is unlikely to detect HIV at this point, other testing will be effective. Be sure to speak candidly about your risks and concerns with your health care provider so that the right test is ordered.
Basically the test is to check for the HIV antibody and NOT the HIV virus itself.
With an hiv test
A thyroid blood test will not detect HIV. Ask for the HIV test by name.
There are actually three different types of HIV test: * antibody tests - which detect the antibodies that the immune system produces in response to an HIV infection * antigen tests - which detect the presence of HIV's p24 protein * RNA / NAT (nucleic acid based) tests - which detect the viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) Only the antibody and RNA / NAT tests are used for routine diagnostics.
86689. Antibody; HTLV or HIV antibody, confirmatory test (e.g, Western Blot).
You can prevent HIV by using condoms and tell your partner to go see a Clinic and take the HIV -antibody test.
No, it's only detected by a chlamydia test.
Most forms of HIV testing do not test for the virus itself. The tests are designed to detect antibodies that are related to HIV infection. Although extremely accurate, it is important to confirm any reactive test, making certain the anitbodies that were detected are indeed those from HIV infection.
Western Blots used to diagnose HIV infection detect antibody to a range of HIV proteins. Instead of giving just one answer, they show "positive" or "negative" for each protein on the western blot strip. This makes them very specific for HIV.
(HIV) is usually diagnosed with a blood test. Cultures for HIV are possible, but rarely needed for diagnosis.The FDA also approved an HIV test in 2004 that can detect HIV in saliva.