So many women have miscarriages that it is unlikely. If you both had recurrent miscarriages and neither of you have had a baby it is possible but still unlikely. i dont have an answer to that but my husband's ex had a miscarriage and so did I.
its a normal fault
What you could be describing could be a fault line. It could be a subduction zone. It could be a ridge.
yes
How could you design an experiment to show how a fault is formed
inundation is the fault that can effect the puget sound
You are not at fault. Miscarriages occur for a variety of reasons, usually the simple fact that for some reason the fetus was not able to develop in a normal fashion. This is a common thing. Most women have miscarriages, they simply do not recognize them as such because the pregnancy terminates itself before they realize they are pregnant. You were not so fortunate, but it is highly unlikely that you had anything to do with it. Pregnant women work in the fields, do all sorts of strenuous labor, and have healthy children at the end of healthy pregnancies. That has been true since the beginning of the human race. Your child was simply not meant to be born, for whatever reason, and it was not your fault.
A fault is somethig to go against you. A fault could also be a penalty (football and hockey) or a foul (basketball).
ID-10T fault.
No
Possibly because there were more ways back in the day that a woman could have a life outside of the norm. Women whose husbands died or left them learned to live independently. As naturalists and knowledgeable in other ways, they were vulnerable to attack through no fault of their own.
It depends on what happens. It could cause adjacent conductors to clash (line-to-line short-circuit fault), or it could break a conductor which then makes contact with the ground (line-to-earth short-circuit fault), or it could be neither of these.
If it is found to be your fault, then your insurance could go up. If you are found to be at fault, then it shouldn't.