After the civil war, Southern military officers could NOT hold office.
Answer:
Indeed, former CSA Gen. Joseph Wheeler fought as US Brigadier General during
the Spanish-American War in 1898.
The Roman army had no set leader until the principate. During the monarchy the kings were the military leaders. During the republic the military leader could be either a consul, a praetor or a person of proper rank specially commissioned to raise/lead an army. Governors of provinces could also be military leaders, ala Julius Caesar. When the principate was formed the emperor became the top military leader.The Roman army had no set leader until the principate. During the monarchy the kings were the military leaders. During the republic the military leader could be either a consul, a praetor or a person of proper rank specially commissioned to raise/lead an army. Governors of provinces could also be military leaders, ala Julius Caesar. When the principate was formed the emperor became the top military leader.The Roman army had no set leader until the principate. During the monarchy the kings were the military leaders. During the republic the military leader could be either a consul, a praetor or a person of proper rank specially commissioned to raise/lead an army. Governors of provinces could also be military leaders, ala Julius Caesar. When the principate was formed the emperor became the top military leader.The Roman army had no set leader until the principate. During the monarchy the kings were the military leaders. During the republic the military leader could be either a consul, a praetor or a person of proper rank specially commissioned to raise/lead an army. Governors of provinces could also be military leaders, ala Julius Caesar. When the principate was formed the emperor became the top military leader.The Roman army had no set leader until the principate. During the monarchy the kings were the military leaders. During the republic the military leader could be either a consul, a praetor or a person of proper rank specially commissioned to raise/lead an army. Governors of provinces could also be military leaders, ala Julius Caesar. When the principate was formed the emperor became the top military leader.The Roman army had no set leader until the principate. During the monarchy the kings were the military leaders. During the republic the military leader could be either a consul, a praetor or a person of proper rank specially commissioned to raise/lead an army. Governors of provinces could also be military leaders, ala Julius Caesar. When the principate was formed the emperor became the top military leader.The Roman army had no set leader until the principate. During the monarchy the kings were the military leaders. During the republic the military leader could be either a consul, a praetor or a person of proper rank specially commissioned to raise/lead an army. Governors of provinces could also be military leaders, ala Julius Caesar. When the principate was formed the emperor became the top military leader.The Roman army had no set leader until the principate. During the monarchy the kings were the military leaders. During the republic the military leader could be either a consul, a praetor or a person of proper rank specially commissioned to raise/lead an army. Governors of provinces could also be military leaders, ala Julius Caesar. When the principate was formed the emperor became the top military leader.The Roman army had no set leader until the principate. During the monarchy the kings were the military leaders. During the republic the military leader could be either a consul, a praetor or a person of proper rank specially commissioned to raise/lead an army. Governors of provinces could also be military leaders, ala Julius Caesar. When the principate was formed the emperor became the top military leader.
The military leaders tried as best they could to fulfill their leader's orders and fight until they were ordered to surrender. (The political leaders all fled or committed suicide).
German SS and Japanese Military and political leaders
Mesopotamian military leaders had to be strong and fearless. Soldiers looked up to them to provide training and leadership that they could take with them to the battlefields.
Because wealthy southern males could pay to have a substitute to take their place in the army. Whereas, small southern farmers could not afford the luxury of escaping military service.
they wanted to weaken Germany so it could not rebuild its military
The internet was created as a decentralized system so that in times of war, military leaders could still watch porn.
They wanted to weaken Germany so it could not rebuild its military.-novanet
Most likely pride. They didn't care who died so they could accomplish their goal.
they wanted to weaken Germany so it could not rebuild it's military.
So that he could keep some of its pro-Southern leaders in jail, and prevent the state from voting Confederate.
Answer this question… Japanese military leaders believed capturing territory could improve Japan's economy.
Because they had "rebelled" against their own government. The "War of the Rebellion" (Civil War) was an illegal war...it was a crime. Confederates "could" have been executed after the war. Their president, Jefferson Davis was placed in federal prison after the war.
There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.There was no "who" who acted as a check on the power of the republican leaders. The check on their powers was incorporated into the office that they held. For example, an aedile could only judge minor disputes dealing with something like weights and measures while something more serious such as murder was judged by a praetor. Even a consul had to comply with the law and with custom as he could be prosecuted for crimes once he left office.
They had conquered the southern Peloponnesian Peninsula and turned the people into serfs who gave half their produce to the Spartan state. This supported the Spartan citizens who did not have to farm and could devote themselves to military training.
Blacks after the Civil War enjoyed many privileges that their predecessors could only dream of. They could vote, hold office and attend school.
It may come as a surprise to some, but women had almost equal rights with the men in ancient Rome. They could own property, make wills, own businesses and manage their own affairs. They could not, however, vote, hold public office or join the military.
Because freeing southern states weakened the confederacy, the proclamation could be seen as a military action.
Yes, Joan of Arc changed history. She proved that women could be military leaders. She made an impact on the world in just fifteen months!
There have been many opinions regarding the question of how the US Civil War could have been prevented. The answer is yes. If Southern leaders simply applied commonsense to the election of Abraham Lincoln, they could have worked with him to avoid an armed conflict. The basic reason for this was that before the issue of slavery, Lincoln's primary goal was to keep the USA intact. Southern leaders were far too hasty and lacked the patience to remain in the Union and negotiate differnces of opinions among all parties concerned.
No. The structure of civilian control is such that no US military leaders have innate authority today. Although in 1962, a possible coup was the basis for the novel Seven Days in Mayand the 1964 movie based on it.
belived Manchurian resources could help Japan escape the Great Depression
As with English, there are many words for different types of military leaders. The general term would be "líder del ejército", but more specific terms could be "capitán," "general," "comandante," "dictador," "almirante," or Francisco Franco's favorite, "generalísimo."
For me Vietnam defeated US in the Vietnam War. Because North Vietnam conquered Southern Vietnam. And Southern Vietnam is a democratic country and an ally of US. The US Military was restricted by the political situation and was not able to wage war in an effective manner. Because of political pressure, the necessary military resources could not be deployed.
The head dress worn by Roman leaders or any Roman who was awarded one, was a crown. It was usually of laurel leaves and the emperors could have them in gold. These crowns were awarded as a civic honor. The military also had crowns made of oak leaves as an honor.