answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, sharecropping led to what some have described as '' economic slavery '' because the former slave was uneducated, easily misled, manipulated and was exploited by the land owner. There was really no "sharing"at all. Rather, it allowed the continued oppression of the former slaves. Sharecropping was a system of farming that arose at the end of the Civil War.

The freed slaves were poor and uneducated. Farmers would make an arrangement with the sharecropper under which the former slaves would farm the land under strict supervision, purchase their supplies from the farmer, use his machinery and pay the farmer with a large portion of the crop, plus interest. The owner took the majority of the harvests while the sharecroppers family existed on the edge of starvation. The sharecropper could never pay off their debt to the landowner and remained dirt poor. All they had to offer was their labor and they had to use their labor to scratch out a living. They lived in abject poverty. The system eventually involved poor whites also. It was a system that was filled with cruelty, abuse, dishonesty and corruption.

A related system was the crop lien system. The crop lien system kept many farmers in debt to merchants and banks in much the same was a sharecropper was always in debt to the landowner. They could never catch up and earn any actual profits.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

The quality life of a sharecropper was to keep the land nice

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

ask the teacher and F**k you b***h

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was life like for a sharecropping?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp