1980's of course
80s
it is in the 100's
in 1980s.
1981 because that was when it was first identified as a new disease. By the first official announcement of the disease, near to 100 Americans had it.
aids
There was no "olden days" for AIDS. It is a new disease as of the 1970's, 1980's. There was no cure and still is no cure, only control.
Aids aids aids aids aids aids aids aids aids aids aids aids aids aids aids aids!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Increased education has caused a decline in STD rates. The knowledge about HIV-AIDS being incurable has greatly increased protection and prevention rates as a result of the educational publicity. Reportedly, a cure for AIDS will be a reality in the very near future.
No. Aids isn't actually a sickness, but hiv is. You can have hiv in your body in a long time (several years) without feeling sick or anything. What the hiv viruses do is that they infect your body's immune system and cells, and "program" them to make more hiv viruses, which infect new cells. And when they reach a certain point, your body will "give up", and you'll have what we call aids. At the moment there are no kind of medication that can get rid of aids, so there's no way to go from aids to hiv.
we. no no no. we dont have aids. you have aids.
• show each data category in a frequency distribution • display relative numbers or proportions of multiple categories • summarize a large data set in visual form
Not necessarily. A person either has HIV or AIDS. There is no such thing as partially blown AIDS, so full blown AIDS is just as absurd no matter how commonly it is used. Secondly, If a person with AIDS is put on medication, their viral load can reach undetectable, and their CD4's go back up. There have been reports of HIV positive people with undetectable viral loads giving birth to HIV negative children. If your that concerned, why don't you just ask your sister?
the difference between aids and tb is that tb is tb and aids is aids