Matthew: That "spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son" (ii, 15).
This may be found in Hosea xi, 1, and clearly refers to the exodus of the Israelites from Egypt.
Jesus was subsequently taken to Nazareth. Why?
Matthew: "That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, He shall be called a Nazarene" (ii, 23).
contains no such prophecy. Fleetwood admits that "the words are not to be found" in "the prophetical writings," and Farrar says, "It is well known that no such passage occurs in any extant prophecy" (Life of Christ, p. 33). The only passage to which the above can refer is Judges xiii, 5. Here the child referred to was not to be called a Nazarene, but a Nazarite, and Matthew knew that "Nazarene" and "Nazarite" were no more synonymous than "Jew" and "priest." A Nazarene was a native of Nazareth; a Nazarite was one consecrated to the service of the Lord. Matthew likewise knew that this Nazarite referred to in Judges was Samson.AnswerWith regard to the above answer, it seems that, in the Greek NT the word Nazarene was used deliberately, the word Nazirite having a totally different root and difficult to confuse with Nazarene in the original Greek. Scholars believe that the lack of a prophesy in the is because this was to be found in a book or books that have been lost and therefore not included in the modern Bible. This is not incompatable with what we know - as one example in the books of Kings and Chronicles, reference is made several times of the lives of the many Jewish kings to a book called the 'Annals of the Kings of Judah' (varies intranslation), which is now lost.
The accounts are very clear in both Gospels. Luke makes it clear that 'after all these things were done....they returned to Nazareth' but makes absolutely no mention of when. Let's not forget that, whilst a stickler for detail, Luke never met Jesus and relied on other sources (eg Mark's gospel, Peter, material from a lost collections of sayings called 'Q' and possibly Mary, Jesus' mother) for his information. Luke was also, as a doctor and a Gentile, primarily concerned with two things in his gospel: healing and forgiveness, and preaching the Good news to non-Jews. He was not concerned with 'proving' Jesus was the Jewish Messiah as this would not be of interest to him. Therefore, in Luke's account we see little in the way of Old Testament prophesy; he is concerned primarily with Jesus' miraculous birth and his ministry, and not with any details about whether or not he was 'called from Egypt'. Hence, he saw no reason to include this in his account stating that jesus simply and eventually ended up in Nazareth, with no interest paid to any other exile.
Contrast this with Matthew. He writes the most Jewish of the Gospel accounts with one aim in mind; to persuade the reader that Jesus IS the long-awaited Messiah. Therefore he litters his gospel with many Old Testament prophesies, including the one from a document now lost. Matthew wanted to make it absolutely clear that, while Jesus was the long awaited Messiah, he was also the Messiah for all; not just the Jews. Whereas Luke has the baby jesus visited by Jewish shepherds on the night of his birth, Matthew has Jesus visited by Gentile wise men as soon as word has spread to that far-off country. This would have been up to 2 years after his birth judging by the slaying of the children by Herod. To Matthew, speaking directly to the Jews, this tragedy would be still in the memories of those whose families were affected - and so the episode with Herod, the slaughter of the innocents, and Egypt was all included.
Therefore both accounts sit happily with each other. However, you cannot simply take the gospels at face value and decide that one is wrong and the other right. Look into the context; look into the hears and minds of the authors and discern from which angle they are writing. Do this, and suddenly the whole story becomes crystal clear.AnswerTo clarify in regards to Matthew 2:23, the notes in the Zondervan study Bible of the New International Version note that in Jesus' day "Nazarene" was synonymous with "despised".
This seems to be supported by the conversation in John 1:45-46 (NIV):
Philip found Nathanael and told him, "We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote-Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph."
"Nazareth! Can anything good come from there?" Nathanael asked.
"Come and see," said Philip.
Thus this could be in reference to the fulfillment of the prophecies in Psalm 22:6 and Isaiah 53:3 as well as others stating that the Messiah would be "despised". Note "the prophets" (plural).
For Christians, a problem with the Bible is that it contains too many errors and contradictions. Uta Ranke-Heinemann (Putting Away Childish Things) "The nativity accounts in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke (the only two that report about Jesus' birth) are, with respect to time, place, and circumstances, a collection of legends."
Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says, at least in respect to the genealogies that form part of the two nativity accounts, "Inspiration does not guarantee historicity or reconcilability; otherwise God should have inspired the two evangelists to give us the same record." The same comment can safely be applied to the accounts of Jesus being taken from Bethlehem to Egypt (Matthew) or from Bethlehem to Nazareth (Luke).
He traveled from Nazareth to Bethlehem with Mary, where Jesus was born. From Bethlehem he took his family to Egypt. From Egypt they returned to Nazareth.
They fled to Egypt to escape the murder of the boy children of Bethlehem by Herod. After King Herod died, they went to Nazareth to live because they came from Nazareth in the first place. Luke 2, Matthew 2.
Nazareth. Joseph, Mary and Jesus went to Egypt to escape from Herod. After Herod's death, they returned to Israel and settled in a town called Nazareth, in the district of Galilee.Also refer to Matthew 2:19-23.
Mary and Joseph lived in Nazareth. The angel came to Mary in Nazareth. After Jesus was born in Bethlehem and went to Egypt for a short stay, the family returned to Nazareth. Joseph was a carpenter in Nazareth and taught Jesus to be a carpenter which trade he plied in Nazareth. During Jesus' ministry He went to Nazareth and preached in the Synagogue, but the people knowing Jesus most of His life could not believe He was the chosen Messiah.
Mary lived in Nazareth at the time of the Annunciation and was engaged to Joseph at the time so we must assume that he also lived there. After Joseph and Mary, with the infant, Jesus, returned from Egypt. They lived in Nazareth.Joseph lived in Nazareth
It is clear that Jesus, Mary and Joseph did not live long in Egypt. All thre of them returned to Nazareth soon after the death of king Herod. Here Joseph fled to Egypt when he was warned of Herods desire to kill Jesus in a dream and angel told him to return to Nazareth as well.
In Luke's Gospel, Joseph took Jesus to Jerusalem and then home to Nazareth quite shortly after his birth in Bethlehem. But, in Matthew's Gospel, Joseph took Jesus to Egypt instead. This is because, in Matthew's account, wise men came from the east and told King Herod of a baby born to be king of the Jews. Matthewsays that Herod intended to kill Jesus, so Joseph fled with Mary and Jesus to Egypt and remained there until after the death of Jesus.
Nazareth, I think.they lived in Egypt for many years then returned to nazerethAnswerAfter marriage, before Jesus was born, Joseph and Mary lived in; Judea according to Matthew. orGalilee according to Luke
After fleeing to Egypt with his father and mother. Joseph and Mary came back to the city of Nazareth to live in.
The Bible says that an angel told Joseph to take Jesus to Egypt, then again to bring Him back. It doesn't say at what age He was brought back. When Joseph brought Him back they lived in Nazareth of Galilee. Matthew 2:23.
In Matthew's Gospel, Mary and Joseph were returning with Jesus from Egypt to their hometown of Bethlehem, when God warned Joseph in a dream to turn aside and travel to Nazareth instead. The reason for the warning was that one of Herod's sons had become king of Judea, including Bethlehem. Another son was king of Galilee, which included Nazareth, but for some reason Matthew did not see this as an issue. So, to Matthew, it was God who was responsible for the family making this fortunate move.
Yes. Matthew says that Bethlehem was the home town of Mary and Joseph, and that Jesus was born there. Luke also says that Jesus was born in Bethlehem, but in this story, Nazareth is the home town of Mary and Joseph.
Luke's Gospel says that after Jesus was born and it was time for Mary's ritual purification, Joseph and Mary took Jesus to Jerusalem and then to Nazareth.Matthew's Gospel says that after Jesus was born, Joseph and Mary took Jesus to Egypt, where they stayed until King Herod died. They then returned to Judea but, following a warning from God, turned aside and travelled to Matthew 2:23 is not clear whether the family went immediately to Nazareth when they arrived in Galilee, or sometime later.
The Gospels of Matthew and Luke contain stories of the birth of Jesus.In Matthew, the hometown of Mary and Joseph was Bethlehem, where Jesus was born. Magi came from the east to worship him, alerting King Herod to a possible threat to his rule. Mary and Joseph fled to Egypt to escape the threat from Herod, only returning after his death, but Joseph was told in a dream to turn aside and travel to Galilee, where Jesus grew up in the town of Nazareth.In Luke, the hometown of Mary and Joseph was Nazareth in Galilee, but they were required by a census to travel to Bethlehem, where Jesus was born in a manger. Poor shepherds came to worship him. A few weeks later, Mary and Joseph travelled to Jerusalem and then returned peacefully to Nazareth, where Jesus grew up.
Both Matthew and Luke say that Jesus was born in Bethlehem: Matthew apparently because Bethlehem was the home town of Joseph and Mary; Luke because there was a census that apparently required Joseph to be in Bethlehem.
By reading the Nativity story in Luke and Matthew we learn that first of all Joseph, Mary and Jesus traveled to Egypt for a short stay (we don't know how long) and then they returned to Nazareth and lived there for some years.
One thought:According to the Bible, at least three things of note happened in Nazareth:*Joseph and Mary lived in Nazareth when Gabriel spoke to Mary about the birth of Jesus (Luke 1:26, 27)*After returning from Egypt, Jesus, Mary, Joseph and the rest of the family lived in Nazareth as Jesus grew up(Luke 2:51) (Matthew 2:19-23; Luke 2:39).*After Jesus left and was baptized by John, he returned to Nazareth and read aloud Isaiah 61:1+2 in the Synagogue there, applying it to himself. (Luke 4:16-30+Matthew 4:13).
AnswerThe Gospel of Luke says that Joseph and Mary were betrothed in Nazareth, Galilee, before they went to Bethlehem then returned immediately to Nazareth. They seem to have been married in Nazareth, where they continued to live. The Gospel of Matthew says that Joseph and Mary lived in a house in Bethlehem when Jesus was born, although not yet married. Matthew implies that Bethlehem was their hometown and says that they fled to Egypt and stayed there until King Herod died. In this story, there can be no doubt that the young couple were married in Egypt, where they must have lived for some time.
Joseph and Mary were the parents of Jesus of Nazareth.
Jesus early years were spent in Nazareth, as a carpenter in Joseph shop.
Thew Jews of that time did not have last names. Jesus was referred to as Jesus of Nazareth, son of Joseph, of the family of David. Bar Joseph means "son of Joseph" but "Jesus of Nazareth" is the more common usage
Jesus left Bethlehem to escape to Egypt
Bethlehem near Jerusalem. His connection with Nazareth is due to the fact that Joseph and Mary took Him there after their return from Egypt.
A:In Matthew's Gospel, Jesus and his mother Mary are taken by Joseph to Egypt, where they were safe from King Herod. Luke provides a different nativity story in which Jesus is not taken to Egypt, but to Jerusalem, where Matthew's Gospel would place him in the greatest danger from Herod, and then to Nazareth. On this, Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says the two accounts are in details virtually irreconcilable: about Joseph and Mary's home (in Bethlehem in Matthew 2:11 [house]: in Nazareth in Luke 2:4-7, with no home in Bethlehem) and about their travels after the birth of Jesus (to Egypt in Matthew 2:14; to Jerusalem and Nazareth in Luke 2:22,39). Uta Ranke-Heinemann (Putting Away Childish Things) agrees with Brown, simply saying the nativity accounts are both, with respect to time, place, and circumstances, a collection of legends - Jesus was not literally in any danger and was not literally taken to Egypt.
In Matthew's Gospel, Joseph fled to Egypt with Jesus and Mary, and remained there until Herod died. However, in Luke's Gospel, Joseph, Jesus and Mary did not go the Egypt. They travelled to Herod's capital, Jerusalem, shortly after the birth then returned peacefully to Nazareth in Galilee. For Luke, Herod had no interest in the baby Jesus.