Marsupials, because Reptiles have never been mammals and have always had their offspring in eggs outside of them.
Birds and mammals both evolved from reptiles.
A proto-mammal called the synapsid.
fish- amphibians- reptiles- birds -mammals
No. Mammals evolved from synapsid reptiles, a group not closely related to dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are more closely related to modern reptiles and birds than they are to mammals.
It is believed that snakes evolved from lizards. Lizards are an existing group of reptiles, of course, so did not 'evolve into' anything else--they are still here. While mammals and birds evolved from reptiles, they did not evolve from lizards.
Monotremes were among the earliest mammals to evolve. However, in most of the world, all monotremes went extinct as a result of competition with more advanced placental mammals. Australia and New Guinea, however, have been so isolated that there were nearly no placental mammals (except for bats) until humans introduced them. The lack of competition from placental mammals allowed monotremes to survive in Australia.
No. Mammals evolved from a group of reptiles called cynodonts. "Raptor" is an informal term for a group of dinosaurs call dromaeosaurids, which were closely related to the ancestors of birds.
1.Fish 2.Amphibians 3.Reptiles 4.Birds 5.Mammals
They ARE reptiles.
no, the reptiles evolved from fish
No. Opossums, shrew opossums, and the Monito Del Monte (total 102 species) live in the Americas. Also, if you only meant to include the island of Australia in your question, then New Guinea, many islands between Sulawesi and New Guinea, Tasmania, and New Zealand also have marsupial species.
no