Yes Because It Led To War
Yes, the election of 1860 made things worse between the North and the South. The election of Abraham Lincoln, who opposed the expansion of slavery, triggered the secession of Southern states. This ultimately led to the Civil War, worsening the already strained relationship between the two regions.
constitutional union party
1. Arguments between slave and non-slave states. 2. Economic and social differences between the North and South. 3. The election of Abraham Lincon (antislavery) 4. Northern newspapers were saying bad things about the South.
constitutional union party
In the north there is a lot of industry which account's for a lot of things, but in the south there is mostly agriculture.
President Eisenhower did not allow an election.
One reason is the South wanted states rights,north wanted to keep federal rights. Another reason is the fight between Slave and Non-Slave State Proponents,The election of Abraham Lincoln,Economic and social differences between the North and the South. The last one means the south is agrucultral and the north has factory's.
What were some advantages of the South? What about North
President Eisenhower did not allow an election.
South Dakota had 3 electoral votes for the 2008 election.
It increased tensions further between the North and the South
It started because the south was unhappy with the election and the north and south dsagred on slavery.
the major economical difference between the north and the south is the north was based on manufacturing while south was agriculutural