answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.

Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.

Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.

Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.

Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.

Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.

Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.

Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.

Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did roman emperor's have the power to appoint members of the senate?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What type of power did the emperor wield?

It depends on the "emperor" you are talking about. The emperor of Byzantium, or the Greek Eastern Empire, ruled a sophisticated state with many of the same powers and privileges as the ancient Roman emperors. The German emperors of the Latin West aspired to similar prestige, but ruled over a far more fractious polity and had to compete with powerful feudal barons for control of their realm.


Did the Romans believe that all citizens were equal under the law?

Roman women had rights just about equal to men, but they still lived in a male dominated world. For example, a woman could not vote or run for public office. A woman, although she had the right to divorce, still had to have a male relative or guardian make the arrangements. A woman could only inherit a minimal amount from her husband or father. A woman could not join the army. Despite these restrictions, the Roman women had more equality with men than many of their ancient counterparts.


When Rome moved from Republic to Empire what happened to the senators?

Nothing. The senate was still a body under the emperors, but their power was greatly reduced. They could still pass certain resolutions, recognized and affirmed men as emperors, debated some issues and held high profile trials. However the outcome of the debates and the trials was always favorable to the emperor.Nothing. The senate was still a body under the emperors, but their power was greatly reduced. They could still pass certain resolutions, recognized and affirmed men as emperors, debated some issues and held high profile trials. However the outcome of the debates and the trials was always favorable to the emperor.Nothing. The senate was still a body under the emperors, but their power was greatly reduced. They could still pass certain resolutions, recognized and affirmed men as emperors, debated some issues and held high profile trials. However the outcome of the debates and the trials was always favorable to the emperor.Nothing. The senate was still a body under the emperors, but their power was greatly reduced. They could still pass certain resolutions, recognized and affirmed men as emperors, debated some issues and held high profile trials. However the outcome of the debates and the trials was always favorable to the emperor.Nothing. The senate was still a body under the emperors, but their power was greatly reduced. They could still pass certain resolutions, recognized and affirmed men as emperors, debated some issues and held high profile trials. However the outcome of the debates and the trials was always favorable to the emperor.Nothing. The senate was still a body under the emperors, but their power was greatly reduced. They could still pass certain resolutions, recognized and affirmed men as emperors, debated some issues and held high profile trials. However the outcome of the debates and the trials was always favorable to the emperor.Nothing. The senate was still a body under the emperors, but their power was greatly reduced. They could still pass certain resolutions, recognized and affirmed men as emperors, debated some issues and held high profile trials. However the outcome of the debates and the trials was always favorable to the emperor.Nothing. The senate was still a body under the emperors, but their power was greatly reduced. They could still pass certain resolutions, recognized and affirmed men as emperors, debated some issues and held high profile trials. However the outcome of the debates and the trials was always favorable to the emperor.Nothing. The senate was still a body under the emperors, but their power was greatly reduced. They could still pass certain resolutions, recognized and affirmed men as emperors, debated some issues and held high profile trials. However the outcome of the debates and the trials was always favorable to the emperor.


What did Roman senators do for the emperor?

By the time of the emperors, the senate had very little power. Their main duties were to pass honorary resolutions, confirm any laws or decisions the emperor may want and to confirm new emperors.


What was not a power held by Rome's emperors?

The Roman emperors were absolute rulers. They power was absolute.

Related questions

Who has the power to appoint officers with approval of the senate?

the president


What is the appointed power?

The president has the power to nominate or appoint judges, ambassadors, cabinet members and other high ranking officials., subject to approval or confirmation by the US Senate.


What is the presidents appointing power?

The president has the power to nominate or appoint judges, ambassadors, cabinet members and other high ranking officials., subject to approval or confirmation by the US Senate.


What is power of appointment of the president?

The president has the power to nominate or appoint judges, ambassadors, cabinet members and other high ranking officials., subject to approval or confirmation by the US Senate.


Who is the Constitutional power to appoint ambassadors and to negotiate treaties is vested in?

The Senate.


Who held much less powerunder the empire than it had under the republic in Rome?

The senate and the elected officials held much less power under the emperors than they held under the republic.The senate and the elected officials held much less power under the emperors than they held under the republic.The senate and the elected officials held much less power under the emperors than they held under the republic.The senate and the elected officials held much less power under the emperors than they held under the republic.The senate and the elected officials held much less power under the emperors than they held under the republic.The senate and the elected officials held much less power under the emperors than they held under the republic.The senate and the elected officials held much less power under the emperors than they held under the republic.The senate and the elected officials held much less power under the emperors than they held under the republic.The senate and the elected officials held much less power under the emperors than they held under the republic.


How did the Roman Senate gain power?

During the period of the republic the senate was a very powerful body, but it never gained power. It was an advisory body, not a ruling body. During the period of rule by emperors the senate was reduced to a rubber stamp body for the policies of the emperors.


Augustus' new political system allowed emperors to choose their A. Senate B.Family C. Successions D. Language please help?

Augustus's new political system allowed Roman Emperors to choose their Senate. This diminished the power of the Senate and place d all political power into the hands of the Emperor.


The President has the power to appoint Ambassadors and Officers but who has the confirmation authority?

2/3 of the Senate has to approve of his elected.


What branch has the power to appoint supreme court justice?

The US Senate (Legislative Branch) has the power to approve or disapprove Supreme Court appointments.


The custom that gives the senate some control over the president's power to appoint officials is called?

Senatorial courtesy


What type of power did the emperor wield?

It depends on the "emperor" you are talking about. The emperor of Byzantium, or the Greek Eastern Empire, ruled a sophisticated state with many of the same powers and privileges as the ancient Roman emperors. The German emperors of the Latin West aspired to similar prestige, but ruled over a far more fractious polity and had to compete with powerful feudal barons for control of their realm.