0
Did the articles of confederation provide for a representative government?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
The Articles of Confederation created a government that is known as a "confederation." Drafted during the years 1776 and 1777, while the colonists were still fighting for independence, the Articles of Confederation created a weak national government with most of the governmental powers retained by the states. The Articles provided no separation of branches. There was no president or any other independent executive, nor was there a federal judicial branch. Congress, the legislature, was the only branch of government. Laws required unanimous votes. Members elected to congress did not vote as individuals, but as states. While congress did have some powers, it could not enforce its laws on the states or the people. States were permitted to coin their own money. There was no regulation of commerce between the states and states could even enter into treaties with foreign nations and declare war, “with the consent of Congress.” Congress could not tax the states or the people, it could only request funds to run the government.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoNo, they did not. This was because the original framers were afraid of a monarch having overwhelming control of the people, which was the main reason for their revolution and creation of a new country. No head of state was provided.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoYes they did not provide the federal governmet the power to impose or collect taxes. It also gave little power to enforce Federal Laws.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoNo, the Articles of Confedration made the central government very weak.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are the articles in the constitution the same as the articles in the Articles of Confederation?
No they are not the same. The Articles of Confederation didn't provide the power for the government to collect taxes, for example. No, they "were" not the same* *Different author from the first paragraph.
Did the Articles of Confederation provided the US an effective government?
The Articles of Confederation did NOT provide the United States with an effective government. It lacked many powers that we now have. For example the government in the 1780's couldn't impose taxes, it was unicameral, and it could not declare war. If it would have been effective we would still be under the power of the articles instead of the constitution.
Why did the articles of confederation fail to provide for an executive and judicial branch of government?
LOL! i had this same question for homework. shame :P
The most significant change from the Articles of Confederation to the US Constitution was the?
strengthening of the federal government. The Articles of Confederation created a weak central government with limited powers, while the Constitution established a stronger central government with the ability to tax, regulate commerce, and raise an army. This shift was necessary to address the shortcomings of the Articles and provide a more effective framework for governing the country.
Why did the government under the articles of confederation last only a few years?
Failure of Articles of ConfederationIt didn't provide a strong central government. the states acted completely independent of each other. acting for their best interest and not that of the states.
What criticism of the articles of confederation and which government did they say they had too much of it?
The main criticism of the Articles Of Confederation was to provide adequate powers for the central government. The State Government had too much power.
One shortcoming of the Articles of Confederation was that it did not provide for?
The Articles of Confederation failed to provide for a national judiciary, which was one of its shortcomings. The Articles of Confederation were created in 1777.
Are the articles in the constitution the same as the articles in the Articles of Confederation?
No they are not the same. The Articles of Confederation didn't provide the power for the government to collect taxes, for example. No, they "were" not the same* *Different author from the first paragraph.
What are two weaknesses of articles of confederation?
There were at least two major weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation. The first was that it did not provide enough revenue for the central government and it did not allow for person liberties of the citizens.
Why did Americans want a stronger government than the one created by the Articles of Confederation?
Americans wanted a stronger government than the Articles of Confederation provided for a number of reasons. The Articles of Confederation lacked the necessary powers to govern effectively leaving it unable to enforce laws collect taxes or provide for a unified military. The Articles of Confederation also did not have any means of resolving disputes between the states. Furthermore the Articles of Confederation did not have a strong executive branch and could not create a unified currency. Finally the Articles of Confederation did not allow for the direct participation of citizens in the government and it was difficult to amend the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation lacked the necessary powers to govern effectively leaving it unable to enforce laws collect taxes or provide for a unified military. The Articles of Confederation did not have any means of resolving disputes between the states. The Articles of Confederation did not have a strong executive branch and could not create a unified currency. The Articles of Confederation did not allow for the direct participation of citizens in the government and it was difficult to amend the Articles of Confederation.These shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation led Americans to seek a stronger more effective government that could better meet the needs of the nation.
Did the Articles of Confederation provided the US an effective government?
The Articles of Confederation did NOT provide the United States with an effective government. It lacked many powers that we now have. For example the government in the 1780's couldn't impose taxes, it was unicameral, and it could not declare war. If it would have been effective we would still be under the power of the articles instead of the constitution.
Did the articles of confederation provide a strong system of checks and balances for the federal government?
No. That's why they wrote the constitution.
Why did the Founders throw out the Articles of Confederation and start over?
Because it did not provide a strong enough central government. Because it did not provide a strong enough central government.
Why did the articles of confederation fail to provide for an executive and judicial branch of government?
LOL! i had this same question for homework. shame :P
Which plan did not provide for a national court system?
The Articles of Confederation did not provide for a national court system. The Articles of Confederation were eventually replaced by the U. S. Constitution.
What did the articles of confederation not provide for on the national level?
I need this answer ASAP.
What did both shays's rebellion and the Pennsylvania Mutiny cause Americans to realize about the articles of confederation?
C. The articles of Confederation did not provide for a strong enough-
