No. Historians show that it was an attempt to stop the spread of Communism following the takeover of China by the Communist Party in 1949, the attempted military conquest ofby Communist in 1950, and the defeat of the French colonial forces by the Communist-led Viet Minh in Indochina. There is a tradition of trying to blame all modern wars on the desire to control resources, but there is generally little data to support it and the ideas are spread by invoking elaborate conspiracy theories. Vietnam did not have oil resources during the war and has found and developed large oil resources only in recent years. Today it still has to import part of the petroleum it needs for its domestic use.
The slimy truth is "yes" thewas fought over oil, just as Iraq and Afghanistan are about oil. I know because the company I worked for in the 1970s (subsequently bought by Halliburton) was then the largest seismic data collector on the planet. Studies by our marine crews indicated vast oil deposits in the waters off Vietnam potentially many times the size of Saudi Arabia's.
This is not public information, nor will it ever be unless Halliburton releases it, but I was present in board meetings during the Vietnam war where these findings were discussed. The phrase "oil is synonymous with national security," was the reply to my expressed concerns about the Vietnam "conflict." Vietnam subsequently became one of the top 50 oil exporters in the world. Last I checked, the oil derricks offshore Ho Chi Minh City, formerly Saigon, were Russian. According to Wikipedia, Vietnam is #29 worldwide in proven oil reserves.
The confrontation in May of this year (2015) between China and other states bordering the South China Sea prove they now know what the US knew in the 60-70s about the presence of oil there.
Oil has become not just an ecological nightmare, it is a national and global security risk. How many lives must be sacrificed on the alter of carbon before we wise up and switch to renewable energy.
Because they were the ones that were going to have to go over to fight in a war that they didn't support.
Guerrilla war in South Vietnam '55; conventional war with North Vietnam '64.
The US went to war with Communist NORTH Vietnam to prevent them from conquering South Vietnam.
He may have visited there but he was not a wartime president during the Vietnam war. It was over for the US before he gained the office of the presidency.
The US took it over, when Johnson received the go ahead from the Tonkin Gulf Resolution.
the Vietnam war against the Americans went for 20 years
The United States went into war with Vietnam in the year 1965.
women started to go to war in the Vietnam war in the 1960s
There was no "Vietnam" during the Vietnam War. Communist NORTH Vietnam was attacking non-communist SOUTH Vietnam, and the US was trying to drive the communists out of South Vietnam...trying to stop communist aggression. It's called the Vietnam War because it's a lot easier to say, and less confusing...than to say "South Vietnam War" or "North Vietnam War", so some people go so far as to say the war in Southeast Asia instead.
The NUMBER ONE reason for protesting the war was THEY DIDN'T WANT TO GO TO VIETNAM (THE DRAFT!).
Communist North Vietnam wanted to unite with NON-Communist South Vietnam.
Over 7,500 US military women nurses volunteered to go to Vietnam.
To fight communism and preserve the Republic of South Vietnam.
To prevent them from conquering South Vietnam.
No- you did not get to choose, you had to go. If they said for you to go, you got to go but you had to be 18 or older. TRUST ME- I'M IN 6TH GRADE AND I JUST LEARNED ABOUT THE VIETNAM WAR!!
no country wants to go to war
Those that didn't have to go.
Over Oil...It's just that simple folks.
French Indochina War (1946-1954).
Of the approximate 50,000 Australian servicemen who served in Vietnam, about 19,000 of them were draftees.
France. Before the COld War began, Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos were the colony of French Indochina.
The Vietnam War began in November 1955 and lasted until April 1975. The war resulted in victory for the North Vietnamese.
18. However, there are reports of younger servicemen having served in Vietnam.
Not as of now.. during Vietnam, for sure.
Vietnam never had the ability to take over the US, any more than it had the ability to take over France two decades earlier. To make the enemy give up and go home was the Vietnamese objective, and it required a colossal effort just to accomplish that.