no white roses do not have thorns. :P
No, carnations do not have thorns.
yes they can
Thorns on roses serve as a defense mechanism to protect the plant from being eaten by animals. It's a necessary adaptation for survival in nature, rather than something related to fairness in human terms.
yes
Thorns are inherited. They result from genetics.
I believe roses have many thorns
they have poky thorns on their stem that protect them. =)
roses.
Not all thorns have roses (example: briar bushes) and just because a rose bush has thorns does not mean it has roses. So the premise of this is illogical. You cannot depend on thorns to assume you'll find or see roses, that roses will ever be found or seen, or whether you're looking at a rose bush at all. The only logical answer, then, is to rejoice that we have gloves to hold a rose stem and snippers to cut off its thorns if present. But we also must appreciate that thorns serve a protective function for the roses we enjoy. For example, a deer's nose is awfully sensitive--when it comes to nosh (eat) a rosebud, its nose will get pricked by thorns so it learns to leave roses alone.
false
No.
Well, maybe they meant like guns are beautiful (like roses) but bullets make them harmful and scary (like thorns...) maybe...
The cast of Roses and Thorns - 1912 includes: Jules Brulatour as The Chauffeur Dorothy Gibson Clara Goodstadt Charles Hundt
They don't !... The thorns are part of the original plant. When they're harvested for commercial purposes, the thorns are simply left on the stems.