Yes, Linux applications have significantly less viruses than Windows or Mac's OS. As Linux makes up less than two percent of OS usage, it makes no sense to the creators of viruses to make a virsus for Linux.
The use of a Linux Virtual Machine is to run a copy of Linux on your current operation system. This will allow you to run various applications that only run on Linux.
One advantage... there are very few viruses written to affect Linux systems. One disadvantage... due to the relatively small number of users, technical assistance may be sparse.
Because only 4% of people use OSX, so no one bothers to attack it. Even less people use Linux, and it is super secure.
This is often highly debated by IT experts. In terms of licensing only, Linux is much less expensive than Windows: Linux is free of cost as the GPL is a license applied to distribution only. Where it gets fuzzy is in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), some argue Linux is more "expensive" because of training and hardware support, though others argue that for normal users who need to use a few applications those TCO factors are not relevant. In my opinion Windows is much more expensive.
Smartphones definitely can. Others it is less likely, but might still happen depending on the design of the phone.
Absolutely - Linux is an alternative (though less-popular) operating system to Windows.
If by "susceptible" you mean "likely to get them", then no. By definition, alternative operating systems have fewer users, and are thus less interesting for virus writers to target. Some alternative operating systems, such as Linux or FreeBSD, have a better security model than Windows, and thus would not be as vulnerable even if they were in the majority. Others, such as AROS have very weak security schemes and lack viruses only through obscurity. Finally, work-alikes of older operating systems, such as FreeDOS, are as susceptible to viruses as their ancestor (MS-DOS). No one writes DOS viruses anymore, though, so FreeDOS is relatively safe in that regard.
The Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) is a feature of Windows 10 and later. It allows users to run programs compiled for Linux on Windows without dual-booting or using a traditional hypervisor like VMware / VirtualBox. There are two implementations of WSL available: WSL1 (the original implementation) emulates a Linux kernel. It uses less RAM than WSL2, but is incompatible with certain programs. WSL2 runs a real Linux kernel in a simplified version of Hyper-V. Because it uses a real Linux kernel, it is compatible with more applications, but it also uses more RAM.
The advantages of using a Linux dedicated server are access to more scripting languages and Linux is an open-source free software (costs less to make a Linux server).
Linux runs it's graphics entire in user space. Windows runs much of it in kernel space. When the graphics core of Windows crashes, the entire system goes down. When the graphics core in Linux crashes, it can easily be restarted without rebooting the computer. And Linux 1-It is for free. 2-It has open source
no completely no.
One advantage... there are very few viruses written to affect Linux systems. One disadvantage... due to the relatively small number of users, technical assistance may be sparse.