answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Venus, the Number 13, Solar Max 2012, the End of the 'World'…

and the

New World Order?

Is this

indeed a timeline??,

most accurate?

Or ..fault/y.

*Noticed.. by

"Morning Star Venus Alignment 2012 NWO Rise of Babylon (6/7)"

http://au.YouTube.com/watch?v=trLtefmdcGo&feature=related

The number 13.

1, and 3.

3 / Military. (WTC, Madrid, London)

1 / Financial. (Wall St)

*note ,

um ,

it's my 'suspicion/deduction/use' regarding forth being a '1, and different' is used.

leaving..

-Forseen,

because it 'appears' to be timed to the orbit of Venus, by someone able*.

….

(Most 'apparently?seemingly?!!' the Bush/Military/Luminary-Secret Society Family'.

Those who also stand to gain, importantly/of course.)

…so,

how are

the 3 bombings of the WTC, Madrid, and London

the planet Venus,

WALL ST,

Georges' 'Elites/The Power'

and the numbers 1 and 3..

..Exactly timed..??

and set.??

apparently..?

**

December 13, 2008.

George Jr President.

It begins.

THE 8 years.

**

Wikipedia

-*A curious aspect of Venus's orbit and rotation periods is that the 584-day average interval between successive close approaches to the Earth is almost exactly equal to five Venusian solar days. Whether this relationship arose by chance or is the result of some kind of tidal locking with the Earth, is unknown

As it moves around its orbit, Venus displays phases like those of the Moon: it is new when it passes between the Earth and the Sun, full when it is on the opposite side of the Sun, and a half-phase when it is at its maximum elongations from the Sun. Venus is brightest when it is a thin crescent; it is much closer to Earth when a thin crescent than when gibbous, or full.[42]

Venus's orbit is slightly inclined relative to the Earth's orbit; thus, when the planet passes between the Earth and the Sun, it usually does not cross the face of the Sun. However, transits of Venus do occur in pairs separated by eight years, at intervals of about 120 years, when the planet's inferior conjunction coincides with its presence in the plane of the Earth's orbit. The most recent transit was in 2004; the next will be in 2012. -*

It WELL appears..(???)

THOSE IN 'POWER' ARE USING THE 8 YEAR 'CYCLES/RISING DATES' OF VENUS,

AS 'EVENING STAR',

ON JUNE 11 200

And, thety are using numbers of the (long count) Mayan Calendar End-date.(as Venus timing Code)..

13.0.0.0.0.

(Baktun)

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imageresden_Codex_p09.jpg)

Repeat,

13.0.0.0.0.

From which the following 3 code numbers can be extracted,

1, 3, and 0

And.. when used with the rising dates of venus..

(..sickeningly??)

(1/3) WTC _______________(2/3)Madrid _______(3/3)London

Rising Date. 11/ 06/ 2000 ___RD. 08/ 06/ 2004 ___RD. 08/ 06/ 2004

_________++/ ++/ ++++______++ /+-/ ++++ ______+-/ ++/ ++++

__________00/ 03/ 0001______ 03/ 03/ 0000 ______01/ 01/ 0001

________= 11/ 09/ 2001 _____= 11/ 03/ 2004 ____= 07/ 07/ 2005

The DATES OF THE BOMBINGS!!!!!!!

??????????TRUTH..?

Docunentary then asks for us to 'do the math' on the next one., as vid was made months ago

thoughts on what the 'most' NEXT arrangement might be???????????????

??Hmmm..

When was the 'plug pulled/bomb let off' on the American financial sector?

Anyone know..?

it is the..

**

(…Equals??)

(1/3) WTC (2/3)Madrid (3/3)London

00/ 03/ 0001 03/ 03/ 0000 01/ 01/ 0001

____The 3 ______________________The 1

_03/ 03/ 0000 __________________??/??/????

& 00/ 03/ 0001

& 01/ 01/ 0001

Means/leaves/next/missing..

'add/replicate sytem' of 1's, 3's and 'absolutely' evenly..

leaves

00/ 03/ 0000.

??

So..

Rise.date09/ 06/ 2008

________00/ 03 / 0000

________++/ ++/ ++++

______= 9th / Sept / 2008

****************************

The 9th September 2008

http://business.watoday.com.au/business/the-mighty-irony-of-the-frannie-bailout- 20080909-4cyr.HTML

The mighty irony of the Frannie bail-out

• Michael West

• September 9, 2008

• Page 1 of 3 | Single Page View

Wall Street has reacted well to news the US Government would become the world's biggest home lender.

So is this the beginning of the end of the credit crisis?

The nationalisation of the two home mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should avert a systemic failure that threatened mass defaults in the housing market, just as the Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson, designed it.

It's a move heavy with irony. The Republicans, proponents of free-market capitalism, pulling off the biggest nationalisation since World War II. The laissez-fair brigade, which usually bays about the evils of big government, is silent as the taxpayer rescues the banking system.

There is now further precedent from the US Government for privatising profits and socialising losses. The bail-out of the investment bank Bear Stearns came first. Ironically, the markets bounced hard too at this news, which was followed up with the once-in-a-lifetime offer for the other Wall Street investment banks to swap their illiquid assets for government Treasury bonds, which they could "short" and turn into cash.

Before the "Frannie" bail-out, the debt of the two mortgage giants was rolling over at 130 points above treasuries. No one wanted to buy it. These two were hitting the wall as Washington stepped in. But this 130 point spread was the interesting thing. The obligations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac two had always carried an implicit government guarantee. Why, in that case, was the debt so expensive? All that has happened now is the guarantee has become explicit. With that kind of backer, Frannie should have been trading at a 30 point spread.

Looking at the bail-out from the perspective of a Government transaction that extra 100 points on a trillion dollars in debt was going to cost taxpayers more in the long run than stepping in now with a full guarantee. The estimated $US25 billion ($30.7 billion) cost to taxpayers, though, is laughable.

This was a deal which Paulson felt had to be made. Had the US Treasury simply gritted its teeth and waited for the mortgage market to recover, the higher costs passed on to home owners via the collapse of Frannie would have simply turbocharged the chaos and lack of confidence in the housing markets.

Continued...

***********

1 of 1,

The 9th of September,

2008.

and the 'Wall Street Bail-Out' swindle.

The 1 of 1.

so...

THEY/THEM/THOSE/POWER/CHARGE/THEIR.. (apparently?)

Their sacred number apears to be 13.

THE summation, of the 'people in charge' AFTER study of all known/apparent relationships.

Venus, and the number 13?

known/suspected relationships.

mathematical, astronomical, and religious.

JUST a couple.

(MORE /ALL are NEEDED.)

*Mayan great respect for venus, and their enddate/coding numbers used (1,3,&0)

*the 8 year tenure of george Jr,

and his starting and finishing on the cycles of venus

* Earth Venus ratio = 8 versus 13.

Maya calendar based on Venus = 13 x 144000 = 1872000 days.

Earth = 1872000 days / 8 = 234000

And Radius sun = 432000 miles.

432 and 234 are the perfect mirror numbers added together = 666.

234 is 13 x 18 = Revelation 13:18 = Number of Beast.

*5 x 584 = 13 x 225 = 2922 days (8 years).

584 = one venus orbit as seen from earth.

225 = one venus orbit as seen from the sun

All related.

Quite 'directly/fittingly'.

http://www.alabe.com/VeCycle-1.pdf

How long does it take for Venus to orbit the Sun

http://www.johnpratt.com/items/astronomy/eve_morn.HTML

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761557158/Venus_(planet).HTML

**

their..

God of War..?

Only the Mayans have a loose connection as they developed a religious calendar based in part upon its motions, and held the motions of Venus to determine the propitious time for events such as war, but this was amongst many other meanings derived from its presence. "

the Mayan culture indeed (also) worshiped venus as the 'determiner of the propitious time for war' .

as for why the doco maker (wrongly?) particularly called/refers to venus as 'their' GOD of war, i don't know, or think it matters much.

(except the reference to 'war' part. very apt regarding correllated events)

The numbers 1, 3, and 0.

They come DIRECTLY from the Mayan study of venus/their end date, 1.3.0.0.0.0.

what are the odd's that..

Using them in a simple mathematical formula respectfull of them definitively 'states' political/terror-logical dates of interest.

definatively.

which is why i am harping on/asking for confirmation.

..because

if this part of the doco ends up being pretty much FACTUAL and TRUE...

..then the other stuff discussed..??!!!

********

13,

1 & 3,

3 x 'bombs', (bombings)

1 x ??..what

=

-1 x 'crash'.

wallstreet/fedres/bankers/govt SWINDLE.

9th sept 2008

********************

All assistance in confirming details would be great.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Do the 'Secret Society Military industrial Complex and Invested Elite' appear to worship 'War Venusthe Mayan's and the numbers 1 3 and 0'..?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which long-standing institution became compromise after the cold war?

The military-industrial complex


Who benefits from the military industrial complex?

i do


How is the Military Industrial Complex a threat to democracy?

no


What is meant by the phrase military industrial complex?

not much.


What is meant by the phrase military-industrial complex?

not much.


What is the military-industrial complex and what threat does it pose to us democracy?

death.


How does the United States obtain its military arms?

It is called the military industrial complex which Ike warned us about,


Eisenhower's farewell address was describing what?

The growth (and dangers) of the Military-Industrial Complex


Spending more on the miltary is what?

Spending more on the miltary is called military industrial complex.


Which long-standing institution became compromised after the Cold War?

The military-industrial complex


Which president coined the term Military-Industrial Complex?

franklin roosevelt


Who warned against the dangerous powers of the military-industrial complex?

President Dwight D. Eisenhower, near the end of his second term.