The answer is yes. Fish do need at least one male in the tank to fertilies the eggs. However in some cases the fish will first lay the eggs then the male will fertilize them.
No the female usually should take care of the eggs so you need a female
It is likely the eggs are "spermed" (for lack of a better term) after they are layed. **This happens in the wild as well. The female does not need a male to lay eggs, but the eggs need a male to fertilize the eggs. The eggs will just stay eggs in the tank without a male to fertilize them. The female may also eat the eggs if left in there with her.
to fertilize the eggs
You will need a female to lay the eggs and a male to (first) fertilize the eggs.
they need male and feamale
producing fishFirst of all you need a female and a male fish but its hard to tell what gender a fish is .In the rite surcomstances the female fish will lay her many eggs and afterwoods the male fish will insert his sperm into the eggs. They dont have sex.But its hard for fish to lay eggs in captivity
No. You do not need a Rooster ( no such thing as a male chicken) to get a chicken to lay eggs. Eggs are produced based on daylight paterns. The rooseter is only needed if you want to fertilize the eggs.
You will need a male for that.
You need roosters to fertilize the eggs, therefore producing more chicks.
no. the male betta just cares for the eggs. the male betta does somthing to the female called an embrace, he basicly hugs the eggs out of her than he kills the female or his just fights with her until she leaves him alone. then he cares for the eggs until hatching.
yes the male need to fertilize
You need someone to donate eggs and then they fertilize them and then insert them into your uterus.
no not really.Well, I do know that there is a particular kind of fish that, when the need is really high, a female can change itself into a male (with male genitalia), mate with the female and therefore lay eggs. However, this only suits the question when the transsexual fish is to be considered a female.