Prefix: reinterpret
Suffix: interpretation
yes it does it is (il)
the word "scoff" does not contain any prefixes or suffixes.
Indignant has the prefixes in- meaning in, into, against, or not and the suffixes -ant meaning person who blank.
The main part of a word without any affixes is the root word.The root, which lacks both prefixes and suffixes.
The root word for convulsion is convulse. The root word can usually be found when you remove any prefixes or suffixes. The term 'convulse' means to shake or disturb violently.
vitalized, invital, all you have to do is add a ed to the end or a in to the begining or any suffix or prefixx you want
brevity
I'm not very sure about it
the word "scoff" does not contain any prefixes or suffixes.
There isn't any because the word gnat (you spelled it wrong) does not have a prefix or sufix. Not all words have prefixes or sufixes.
Indignant has the prefixes in- meaning in, into, against, or not and the suffixes -ant meaning person who blank.
Yes
The main part of a word without any affixes is the root word.The root, which lacks both prefixes and suffixes.
The main part of a word without any affixes is the root word.The root, which lacks both prefixes and suffixes.
A root is the common term for the word before it has any prefixes or suffixes added on to it.
The root word for convulsion is convulse. The root word can usually be found when you remove any prefixes or suffixes. The term 'convulse' means to shake or disturb violently.
Last time I checked, supportive was its own word, no prefixes or suffixes. In any other case, sup means hello...
or is definetely one, and er is possibly one. Hope this helps :)