yes, but well operated plants contain the pollution
AnswerNuclear power has a carbon footprint most recent studies put at about 90 grams equivalent of carbon dioxide per kilowatt hour (gCO2e/kWh). This compares to 15 to 20 gCO2e/kWh for hydro and wind, 35 to 40 gCO2e/kWh for current generation solar photovoltaics, or 445 gCO2e/kWh for combined cycle natural gas in a cogeneration situation.
All nuclear plants put about 60 to 70% of the energy they produce into the environment; this is called heat pollution, and it is damaging to the environment, causing fish kills and so on.
Over a quarter of all the nuclear plants in the United States have tritium leaks putting tritiated water into the ground water under the plants. There is remediation underway at some plants, but not all, and some of the radioactive water is going into rivers, lakes, or the ocean. This is ongoing.
In addition, the mining and refining processes supporting the nuclear industry are all heavy polluters. And, in the United States, the enriching process is powered by a plant that is rated as the country's heaviest polluting coal burning plant. See the related link below.
Nuclear energy can be a pollutant, because some of the waste has to be dropped somewhere. But splitting atoms can produce a lot of energy making it a very good resource, but Nuclear power plants are very expensive. The production of electrical energy using Nuclear energy, once the raw materials have been mined, in its self causes minimal pollution. However it should be kept in mind that should any thing go wrong in the process the consequences can be catastrophic. the storage of nuclear waste is also a an ever present problem.
Nuclear power does not produce pollution, in the way that fossil fuels do, that is carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, or sulfur dioxide. So if we use nuclear as a substitute for fossil fuels, we reduce pollution, but if in fact you just burn as much fossil fuel as before because demand has risen, the pollution will be the same.
It is not a complete solution but nuclear power stations produce less air pollution than coal or oil fired ones. They also have their own drawbacks such as the removal and storage of radioactive isotopes
Thermal pollution due to the requirement for cooling water-but this is similar to other types of power plant.
Only the fission products from the fission process, which are enclosed in the fuel rods. There is no pollution unless these fuel rods are damaged and leak to the atmosphere.
They don't produce pollutants like carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxides, which fossil fuels do produce
The primary output of a nuclear power plant is thermal pollution.
No, but they produce radioactive waste.
no
Nuclear power plants do not cause thermal polution.
Air pollution
Nuclear power plants produce electricity by using nuclear energy
It can produce low grade plutonium that need be extracted from the used nuclear fuel through used fuel reprocessing. However, power reactors are subject to the international nuclear safeguards to prevent its misuse.
Nuclear fission
Nuclear power plants do not cause thermal polution.
nuclear power plants
Radon gas, nuclear power plants
Reduction in Air Pollution. Nuclear power can also be part of a strategy to address carbon emissions. Nuclear power plants emit no carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, or nitrous oxides.
The problem of disposing large amounts of nuclear waste is not resolved.
because it doesn't create pollution and it is greener than coal and nuclear power plants :P
because it doesn't create pollution and it is greener than coal and nuclear power plants :P
Power plants that burn fossil fuels and nuclear power plants are very similar in their manner of creating steam. The main difference between the two types of power plants are that fossil fuel plants emit more pollution.
because it doesn't create pollution and it is greener than coal and nuclear power plants :P
Factories, cars, nuclear power plants, tree consuming, engines, etc.
Air pollution
by nuclear power ¬.¬