Answer
Just my opinion but you should marry first for love. Everyone's financial benefits/downfalls will be different based on the two people involved.
That is not a good choice. Unless you have full support financially, you can't really get married. Plus, you have to ask yourself if your parents would let you get married.
Anytime after you find the right person and you are financially able to care for yourselves and any possible children.
no. unless you are married.
Anytime after you find the right person and you are financially able to care for yourselves and any possible children.
When someone marries, he is legally bound to one spouse and is not supposed to marry another without divorce. Financially, they are supposed to support each other and a spouse gets some rights over the marital property.
Yes, a spouse can refuse to contribute financially and still get half in a settlement depending on a couple of factors. The first is how long you have been married and the second is what state you reside in.
It isn't possible to have insurance once in wedlock. To be married, under law, it means that you are fully independent on paying for your own insurance. It doesn't seem to be a problem since people who are married are usually financially prepared for it.
yes is quiet easy,especially when the man guarantee her financially.
It is suitable when you and your partner have a stable relationship, preferably married, want a child together, and are able to financially and emotionally provide for a child.
No. By giving permission for her to get married (and they both require parental consent to get married at 17) you are cutting her loose. She is emancipated and no longer your responsibility.
Financially, as in "The company was financially sound."
There is no exact right time to make a baby. Many people wait until they are financially ready, have a good job, or are married.