Yes, this is true; if the telegraph had been in existence at that time, then the War of 1812 would not have happened because the telegraph could have sped up communications between England and the U.S.
If the telegraph had been in existence at that time, then the War of 1812 would not have happened because the telegraph could have sped up communications between England and the U.S.
The revolution would likely still have occurred, because more of the colonies had grievances and less self-government.
It was an inovative and magical process that changed the world and many thought that the process would never be improved.
America never had apartheid. Apartheid occurred in south africa.
A lot less hectic.
Without the U-2 shoot down we wouldn't have bothered building the SR-71 or reconnaissance satellites. Without them we wouldn't have had access to the superior sensors on those two platforms - the U-2 is too small.
If the telegraph had been in existence at that time, then the War of 1812 would not have happened because the telegraph could have sped up communications between England and the U.S.
If the telegraph had been in existence at that time, then the War of 1812 would not have happened because the telegraph could have sped up communications between England and the U.S.
A full moon has just occurred. That never occurred to me.
we will never know.
The never to be is something that never will occur, whereas the never was is something that has never occurred. They are both non-existent - however, the universe is entropic and is always moving into the future. From a subjective perspective, the never to be is something that you can prepare for: you can prepare for what might happen, and you can prepare for what might not happen. From an objective perspective, the universe is not deterministic: inherent quantum uncertainties (the Heisenberg Principle) describe this. Therefore, we can only predict to very high probabilities what will be and will never be. Therefore while both are non-existent, the non-existent future might stilll happen. A non-existent past never has existed (but may still happen, in which it become an existent past). In this instance the never was is not the never to be. It never was and never will be. There's irony for you. If the non-existent past never has and never will occur, then the never was is the never to be. So to sum up: They are both non-existent. They are the same if the non-existent past will never occur/the non-existent future never has occurred. They are different when the non-existent future has occurred in the past.
WW2 would've been WW1.
Tallahassee has never been a state. It is a city. But you might be asking when it became the state capital of Florida, and that occurred in 1821.
go to a diffrent internet and never come back
never
The revolution would likely still have occurred, because more of the colonies had grievances and less self-government.
ycuu uu ujvnfhchf
go to a diffrent internet and never come back