Fossils show certain species underwent small changes over a period of years the rock in which the fossil is encased dates the fossil and so they can put them in order to show the progression of the physical changes
the answer is elemetary
why did the early scholars reject fossils as a mean to trace human evolution
fossils
why did the early scholars reject fossils as a mean to trace human evolution
There are 5 that can be resurrected from fossils if you include their evolution forms as well.
Fossils, primarilly and nonspecifically.
fossil evidence is when scientist study fossils to figure out how the animal died how it evoled
Fossils!Fossils are the 'remains' of plants and animals (including humans) which lived in the past. Millions of fossils have been found all over the world. They show clearly that different species of plants and animals lived in the past and that they changed over long periods of time. Older fossils are simpler than younger fossils and we can work out the sequence of evolution from these fossils.For example the oldest vertebrate (backboned) fossils are fish. Younger than these are the first amphibians. Then reptiles appear as fossils, followed by birds and mammals.See:http://animals.about.com/od/evolution/a/vertebrateevolu.htmhttp://txtwriter.com/Backgrounders/Evolution/EVpage01.htmlhttp://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/lines/Ifossil_ev.shtmlhttp://www.fossilmuseum.net/
i am not completely sure but i looked on a website and Hominid fossils are the evidence for human evolution website.
bony fish, dinosaurs, bird evolution
Fossils or natural selection
The mechanism for determining evolution of life were fossils, egg, scales and footprints. Most of the knowledge comes from fossils. They tell us about the shape and size of that animal.