In nuclear reactions the atom itself changes while molecules and/or structural organisation of atoms do in chemical and physical changes.
In a nuclear change the identity of the elements present changes. This does not occur in a chemical or physical change.
Chemical reactions
No all chemical reactions do not make new things because if you do a chemical reactions using two of the same things e.g carbon dioxide + carbon dioxide you are not making anything else so no not all chemical reacions make new things
Unlike charges attract. Unlike molecules do not, otherwise everything ever would be attracted to everything else ever.If two molecules are of different charges, then yes, they will attract.
The ability to change into something else is a chemical property. Chemical properties describe the behavior of a substance when it undergoes a chemical change, such as the ability to react with other substances or undergo a chemical reaction. In this case, the ability to change into something else involves a chemical transformation and is therefore a chemical property.
"Hcook" is not a known chemical compound, so it has no chemical name.Is this a misspelling of something else, I couldn't retrieve it anyhow.
Chemical reactions
Yes. Everything you do is caused by a series of complex chemical reactions. Turning the food you eat into energy you can you to run or do anything else for example.
No all chemical reactions do not make new things because if you do a chemical reactions using two of the same things e.g carbon dioxide + carbon dioxide you are not making anything else so no not all chemical reacions make new things
In chemical bonding, the number of protons remains the same. That's because the original elements involved in the chemical reaction remain the same as regards their nuclei. Nothing involving the nucleus of an atom is changed in chemical reactions. This differentiates chemical reactions from nuclear reactions, where changes in atomic nuclei are what makes a nuclear reaction a nuclear reaction.
of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH
Argon, like any other element, is made of protons, electrons, and neutrons*. It can not be made from anything else, except by nuclear reactions. _______________________________ *Except that the hydrogen-1 isotope does not contain neutrons.
Nuclear membrane and nucleolus
Nuclear energy has never been used for launching space craft. The requirements for shielding would make it too heavy, and then there is the risk of it crashing. The only practicable energy source is from high energy chemical fuels.
Charges are like and unlike just like anything else oppisite and alike in a way
Charges are like and unlike just like anything else oppisite and alike in a way
They could be used for making science test or other things, per example: Many chemical reactions release energy in the form of heat, light, or sound. These are exothermic reactions. Exothermic reactions may occur spontaneously and result in higher randomness or entropy (ΔS > 0) of the system. They are denoted by a negative heat flow (heat is lost to the surroundings) and decrease in enthalpy (ΔH < 0). In the lab, exothermic reactions produce heat or may even be explosive.
US, who else?