Short food chains are more efficient than long food chains because you lose energy as you go up the chain. For example, if we say that plants take in 100% of the possible energy, when a rabbit eats that grass, the rabbit only gets 50% of the energy because the plants were using their stored energy to make food. It continues on like this for as long as the food chain lasts. (Note: the amount of energy isn't correct; I just used those percentages as examples.
that is because more and more energy are lost on every level on the food chain. Remember that only 10% of energy gets transffered from ome animal to the other.
hope this helped!
singular or in short chains.
e
Short chains of amino-acids are called polypeptides, while longer a-a chains become, and form, proteins.
A hydrocarbon composed of short carbon chains will ignite more easily, just think how flammable petrol is!
single, pairs or short chains
Food chains are short because a lot of energy are expended at the trophic levels. Also it's because as we consider the many losses of energy such as heat and undigestable parts such as cellulose, hooves, and antlers. There aren't many energy to keep and pass on to the next level. Therefore, food chains contain usually 3-5 levels.
Hotel chains use short-haul applications
singular or in short chains.
What is the name of the short chains of glucose units that result from starch breakdown?
e
decal
Short chains of amino-acids are called polypeptides, while longer a-a chains become, and form, proteins.
A hydrocarbon composed of short carbon chains will ignite more easily, just think how flammable petrol is!
Short answer: No. There is life on Earth that does not require or use the Sun as its basic energy supplier. In deep ocean environments there are animals that use the thermal ports of underwater volcanoes to supply their energy needs.
Banwidth
single, pairs or short chains
Those are gas compounds. We can use it as a fuel.