answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

PROS About Continental army:

*When they were at war they lived close to America, So shipping was faster.
*They had a lot of hope. Like the Movie 300, against Millions.

Cons:
*They're Rifles were all different so it was difficult to support Ammunition to them.
*Lack of health, And knowledge of battle, led many to death in the Continental Army.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pros About British Army:

*They were more sophisticated and they had the latest Guns supported from King George The III, Processed by -----The British Congress/Constitution.
*They were very well trained to fight in war.

Cons:

*Since they were at America fighting the war, and they lived all the way back at Britain, it took very long to ship the the ammunition, food, etc...
*They thought that they weren't gonna lose to some lousy Americans Calling themselves "soldiers". So they thought they would win and didn't give much of a "crap", as some people state it these days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If that answers your question, I would be glad to answer more. And. that is most likely why Americans won the Revolutionary war. At first you yourself would think 50,000 British soldiers, against 17,000 unprepared Americans. -------Kevin =P

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The Continental Army wore no uniforms-- only their everyday clothes. Many had no guns, so they carried spears and axes. Some had fought in the French and Indian War, but most had no military experience. Many were farmers who had just enlisted signed up, for duty in the army.

The British army was made up of professional soldiers with training and experience. The British army also had thousands of mercenaries hired solders.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

The British army fought the Continental Army (American Army).

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

they had the same fighting tactics and they both fired the Brown Bess Muskett

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

The Continental Army and the British Army were significantly different in their organizational structure, levels of experience, and funding. The Continental Army was an undisciplined, unprepared fighting force with makeshift uniforms and sloppy tactics (at least at the beginning of the war).

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How were the Continental army and the British Army the same?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How were the british army and the Continental Army alike?

They were both army's, they had the same fighting tactics, and they both fired the Brown Bess Muskett


Is the Continental Army the same as the Union army?

No. The Continental army that fought the British was organized under a confederacy of colonies (later becoming states under the articles of confederation). The Union army wasn't born until the US constitution was ratified in 1787.


Is continental solders the same as Continental Army?

NO


Does Turkey have a better army than UK?

The British army and the Turkish army has the same strength


What did the British army do in world war 2?

The same as every other army - they fought.


When was the Territorial Army formed?

"The Territorial Army of the UK was formed in 1908, while the same army in India was formed by the british in 1917."


Winner of the battle of Monmouth courthouse?

The result of the Battle of Monmouth was inconclusive. The Continental Army of the US lost 350 to 500 killed, wounded, or captured. The British had about the same casualties.


What are the strengths of the continetal army?

The men in the continental army were literate and committed to the cause. They did not need the same close supervision as the British Solders. When they understood what to do, they would do it and not wait for orders if none were forthcoming. The men in the continental army knew and used Indian tactics. Americans did not follow European Rules of Engagement. They would shoot the British officers and the common solders had no idea what to do. The loss of an American Officer did not cause any such problem. The Americans knew the land. They knew birch and other roots provided vitamin C in winter. The English army could not function in winter.


Is the Battle of Brooklyn the same as the Battle of New York?

It was the first major battle in the Battle of New York and New Jersey which saw the fledgling Continental Army driven into Pennsylvania by the British.


Differences between the british army and the continental army?

the british army of the American revolution was well trained, led and equipped. however, the troops did not fare well so far from England and home. The American army had little in the way of training , equipment and supplies. but, they did have the will to fight the british oppression of the Americas. Washingtons acquiring of General Von Stueben made a big balls change in the training of American troops. the vanquish of british troops helpped the American army with guns and supplies which were in short supply. so, in some way the british helped supply the American forces.......... and that's all. oh yeah


Does a Bombardier outrank a Corporal?

In the British army a Bombadier is the same rank as Corporal


Are the federal army and union army the same?

Yes