Want this question answered?
Laws today are formal and enforced effectively and to a larger population. They also meet different needs then the Mayflower Compact. The Mayflower Compact was crearted so everyone would be doing work and listening to an appointed leader so they could survie. Our laws are so we cant thrive not just to survive.
It changes by the different cultural laws,
"Laws" are just simplified descriptions of theories.
According to the teachings of Judaism, it is the responsibility of every nation to set up just laws for society to behave in a righteous manner. So yes, having a just set of law was very important to the Hebrews. No different than the laws we have today in every country.
In Babylon about c. 1700 BCE.
The Bible is a great place to start the hunt for just laws. Otherwise, examples are hard to find of just laws in society today. Even lawyers specialize.
There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.There were no laws against drugs in ancient Rome, as we know them today. Anyone could make and sell "potents". Weather they worked or not is a different matter. However there were laws against poisoning which could loosely be compared to our drug laws.
No one answer- since the need for a license is determined by state laws- and there are 50 different states- 50 different sets of laws- and that is just in the US. Other nations have other laws.
Please specify what you mean by list of laws.
UK copyright laws have been in place since the early 1700's
Sometimes amendments that were created back in the 1700's our outdated to our standards today. Ratifying is to make something updated or official. So this could be used to keep a countries laws up to standards and clean.
There was no European settlement in Australia in 1700. the first settlers only arrived in 1788, so therefore there was no government. The Aborigines acted under their own tribal laws and structure.