Firstly, keeping the minority from ruling without the support of the whole public. Also, Britain could have kept it as a colony, and send troops when it looks like a massacre is to happen. Or, splitting Rwanda into two states, one with a Hutu majority and another with a Tutsi majority.
According to Jared Diamond in the book Collapse, the Rwandan genocide was the product of a population that was growing rapidly combined with the fact that there was very little economic development or economic opportunity other than subsistence farming. As land pressures increased, the people faced the choice to either starve to death or else stir up violence to kill off some of the surplus population. If one accepts this as truth, and I believe there is a lot of validity to it, then the most important ways to prevent another genocide there would be to increase economic opportunities in their cities while also creating a program to somehow limit population control. When violence broke out, of course, it followed ethnic lines. So a program to better homogenize the population may also be useful, though this is a more superficial approach than addressing the real problems of overpopulation and land shortages.
Genocides are one of the most difficult things to prevent. By the time the outside world knows about one, it has gone for weeks, months or years. More than six decades after the Holocaust, the horrors of Bosnia, Rwanda, and Darfur are sobering reminders that preventing future genocides and mass atrocities remains an enormous challenge. Some persons think that genocide is not the inevitable result of ancient hatreds or irrational leaders. Perpetrators of genocide and mass atrocities cannot succeed without the support of other governments and corporations; so preventing mass atrocities requires political will.
In 2 ways. 1. Rebels had not make violence, would have to wait for negotiation (2002). 2. The Sudanese Govt and its sponsored Janjaweed Militia should not have started killing and clensing. They could arrange negotiation talks.
The only serious way to have stopped the Darfur Genocide would have been military involvement.
Because not enough was done to stop the Rwandan genocide.
uganda war 1978
Because genocide is a horrendous crime against humanity and everything possible should be done to prevent it from ever taking place again.
Most of the killing was done with machettes, and an estimated 800,000 victims were slaughtered in 3 months. This means that the view that killing on the scale and speed of the Holocaust was only possible in an industrial society, using industrial means, needs rethinking carefully.
Two Turkish leaders were assainated after the Genocide but Turkey hasn't done anything not even accepted the fact that it was Genocide. Nothing has been done to punsih Turkey.
Hi there! Yes, the Czech Republic did respond. The Czech Republic responded to the Rwandan genocide by being one of the first countries to call it an actual genocide. Many other countries were cautious to call it a genocide because that implied that they had to punish Rwanda (these countries being: the UK, US, etc). The Czech Republic suggested that Rwanda should split in half (the Hutu in one side and the Tutsi in the other). They suggested this because they had done this themselves earlier in 1993 when they "divorced" Slovakia (used to be Czechoslovakia, remember? :) ). The Czech Republic was furious that the countries in the Security Council were not responding quickly to the issue and were dilly-dallying there time. It was unacceptable to the new country. Hope this helps! This is based on my Model UN experience! :D
NOTING
During WW1, Armenians sided with Russia while fighting with Turkey. If this did not happen it might have made the situation better.
Genocide has taken place throughout history and has been done to many different races and nationality's
There are no commercial flights near this volcano: logistical flights are never flown near Mt Erebus.
what must be done to prevent this from happening
The US should have definitely got involved in the genocide because there were mass murders and they could have done something.