Since there are more trees within the perimeter of the United States NOW than there were when the Spanish arrived, it's difficult to get too excited about some trees being cut down.
In times past, a single forest fire could burn for hundreds of miles, blackening the skies in another continent. Tree huggers don't want ANY trees burned or cut for timber.
While any cutting or burning of timber products is considered "deforestation", modern forest management practices acknowledge the need to harvest wood and to renew forests through the planting of new growth.
Many of the modern forest management purists would rather see forests destroyed by lightening caused fires and allow trees to grow to dangerously high densities rather than allow mature trees to be used for lumber products.
While there is a net regrowth of trees in North America, deforestation is incontrovertibly a problem in much of the remainder of the world, particularly the Tropics. Deforestation, and to a lesser extent forest degradation, are easily monitored with high and medium resolution visible satellite imagery such as Landsat and MODIS.
It's difficult to recommend any action by individuals because of the nature of the problem: Much of the deforestation occurs due to national and international policies and institutions that are in place. Amazon deforestation has historically occurred as the Brazilian government has encouraged citizens to move into its hinterland and settle. Ranchers have followed them and cleared the remainder of the land for cattle raising. In Indonesia, for example, a lot of tropical rainforest has recently occurred to make room for palm oil plantations. Due to the rapidly increasing international demand for this type of oil, profits from palm oil production are considerably higher than land owners could make from international incentives to leave the forest alone.
So as a consumer, the decisions that you make can affect the pattern of deforestation and the sustainability of forest harvest. We can harvest plenty of wood sustainably, but you can start by knowing where the products you buy come from, and at what cost to the environment. But characterizing those who advocate better management of these Natural Resources as "tree huggers" who don't want ANY trees harvested is a strawman that precludes any meaningful discussion, and intentionally ignoring the situation outside the United States obfuscates the true nature of this issue.
Another Perspective:Many of the rare plant species are destroyed by locals because they see no value to them. If a premium is charged for any example of rare plant species, the locals would identify their value, and treat them with respect. If a woodworker in the United States or somewhere in Europe wants to build a project using an exotic wood, there should be high price for the wood, with taxes paid to the country from which the wood was shipped and a premium paid to the locals who are responsible for maintaining a sustainable supply of the species. That model has worked effectively in other parts of the world with endangered animals.BTW, "tree huggers" is an accurate description, since the movement to protect trees owed it's success to people who physically "hugged" the trees to prevent contractors from cutting them down. They even called themselves, "Tree huggers".
You can do the simplest things like for every tree you chop down you plant a new one. Also things like only chop the mature trees down and the young tree grow. or when you cut it down make a hole in the tree and give it anal
deforestation can be sustainable if only the branches were cut down and only certain area's of the rainforest can be cut down but re built..
Only cut the trees down if essential. Replant at least one tree after cutting down one, to replace it.
Deforestation is being managed in a few ways however not enough ways. There are limits for how many trees companies can cut and they must plant new ones.
it can be more sustainable by not cutting trees down for mahogany !!
this question requires a good answer
people are using less paper
Rainforest Partnership's motto is 'Linking People to People for a Sustainable Future'.
This means that the product comes from a sustainable source/a farmed source not natrually occurring rainforest. It also means it will not damage the rainforest in any way.
It means adopting practices that conserve the rainforests by maintaining the ecological integrity of the rainforest. Leave what is left of the rainforest, and develop ways to keep the land that has already been taken over by agriculture without having to want to cut down more trees.
it means creating everlasting improvement in the building industry
Like any vegetable it can be if produced using organic farming methods. Most major coffee blends offer a "fair trade" or "rainforest alliance" Rainforest alliance uses organic farming methods. Tierra from Lavazza is rainforest alliance.
We Can All Play Call Of Duty Black Ops
By leaving it the f&%k alone.
Explain what you mean by 'sustainable' -Obviously it will keep carpet down for years.
There are many charities that help to protect the rainforest. Some of these charities are: the National Aviary, Ecotrust, the Earth Island Institute, the Pachamama Alliance, the Rainforest Action Network, the Rainforest Alliance, the Rainforest Foundation US, World Land Trust-US, and the Sustainable Harvest International.
You make land sustainable by sustaining it. Keep it healthy instead of destroying it in the first place.
As sustain means to keep going sustainable energy comes from wind,and tidal power for example
As far as I know both Guyana and Suriname practice sustainable development of their rain forests....more than 90% of both countries remain untouched.