First of all, the city of Rome never fell. It was sacked four times during antiquity (by the Senone Gauls in 390 BC, by the Visigoths in 410, by the Vandals ion 455 and by the Ostrogoths in 566). However, it was never conquered or destroyed. In fact the city still exists today. The Visigoths did not intend to seize Rome. They moved on to the south of Italy after the sack. The Vandal sack was an act of looting. The king of the Ostrogoths had wanted to destroy the city, but relented as he had been helped to enter the city by the Roman imperial garrison and left to pursue the Byzantine army in Apulia. The Byzantine general then retook the city.
What fell was the western part of the Roman Empire, which collapsed under the weight of the invasions by the Germanic peoples. One could say that the Roman roads made the penetration of this part of the empire by invaders easier. However, the roads in themselves did not prompt the invasions. Moreover, the Romans lost political cohesion. There were usurpations and a lot of infighting and the Romans failed to deal with the invasions adequately. Therefore, if the Roman roads did help the downfall of the western part of the empire, this would have been a very relative factor.
First of all, the city of Rome never fell. It was sacked four times during antiquity (by the Senone Gauls in 390 BC, by the Visigoths in 410, by the Vandals ion 455 and by the Ostrogoths in 566). However, it was never conquered or destroyed. In fact the city still exists today. The Visigoths did not intend to seize Rome. They moved on to the south of Italy after the sack. The Vandal sack was an act of looting. The king of the Ostrogoths had wanted to destroy the city, but relented as he had been helped to enter the city by the Roman imperial garrison and left to pursue the Byzantine army in Apulia. The Byzantine general then retook the city.
What fell was the western part of the Roman Empire, which collapsed under the weight of the invasions by the Germanic peoples. One could say that the Roman roads made the penetration of this part of the empire by invaders easier. However, the roads in themselves did not prompt the invasions. Moreover, the Romans lost political cohesion. There were usurpations and a lot of infighting and the Romans failed to deal with the invasions adequately. Therefore, if the Roman roads did help the downfall of the western part of the empire, this would have been a very relative factor.
i don't know
something about romes
Romes system of roads, aqueducts, ports and common currency made the empire rich and prosperous
they helped the army
The roads helped the missionaries as they made traveling easier, quicker and safer than undeveloped areas.
Roman roads were made with interlocking stones or pavers and still exist. They were well made. Modern are made with a tar base and eventually break down.
Of all the Roman engineering accomplishments, the roads and bridges were the most helpful in unifying the empire.Of all the Roman engineering accomplishments, the roads and bridges were the most helpful in unifying the empire.Of all the Roman engineering accomplishments, the roads and bridges were the most helpful in unifying the empire.Of all the Roman engineering accomplishments, the roads and bridges were the most helpful in unifying the empire.Of all the Roman engineering accomplishments, the roads and bridges were the most helpful in unifying the empire.Of all the Roman engineering accomplishments, the roads and bridges were the most helpful in unifying the empire.Of all the Roman engineering accomplishments, the roads and bridges were the most helpful in unifying the empire.Of all the Roman engineering accomplishments, the roads and bridges were the most helpful in unifying the empire.Of all the Roman engineering accomplishments, the roads and bridges were the most helpful in unifying the empire.
The ancient Romans built roads to help travel their armies from one place to the other
Romes system of roads, aqueducts, ports and common currency made the empire rich and prosperous
About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.
they helped the army
Consumer demand helped trading in Rome.Consumer demand helped trading in Rome.Consumer demand helped trading in Rome.Consumer demand helped trading in Rome.Consumer demand helped trading in Rome.Consumer demand helped trading in Rome.Consumer demand helped trading in Rome.Consumer demand helped trading in Rome.Consumer demand helped trading in Rome.
About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.About the only advancement that the Romans and Incas had in common was their system of good roads which helped unify both empires.
Roads.
Roman roads made Rome (Italy) a powerful nation, because it made it easier for their chariots, wagons, and soldiers to reach all parts of their empire fast and made commerce easier. It's like comparing the USA interstate with normal city roads, with frequent stops, and congestion.
some things that are interesting about rome are that there roads are just like the ones we have today. another thing is that they were the first people to build hollow domes and they improved the arch.
good roads
The roads helped the missionaries as they made traveling easier, quicker and safer than undeveloped areas.
First of all, the city of Rome never fell. It was sacked four times during antiquity (by the Senone Gauls in 390 BC, by the Visigoths in 410, by the Vandals ion 455 and by the Ostrogoths in 566). However, it was never conquered or destroyed. In fact the city still exists today. The Visigoths did not intend to seize Rome. They moved on to the south of Italy after the sack. The Vandal sack was an act of looting. The king of the Ostrogoths had wanted to destroy the city, but relented as he had been helped to enter the city by the Roman imperial garrison and left to pursue the Byzantine army in Apulia. The Byzantine general then retook the city. What fell was the western part of the Roman Empire, which collapsed under the weight of the invasions by the Germanic peoples. One could say that the Roman roads made the penetration of this part of the empire by invaders easier. However, the roads in themselves did not prompt the invasions. Moreover, the Romans lost political cohesion. There were usurpations and a lot of infighting and the Romans failed to deal with the invasions adequately. Therefore, if the Roman roads did help the downfall of the western part of the empire, this would have been a very relative factor.