How did british rule lead to growing Indian nattionalism?
The British rule over India changed the course of history in India. The British came to India at the start of the seventeenth century. This was the time when the British East India Company was established in India to break the Dutch monopoly over spice trade. With time the East India Company increased its powers and started to administer the country. However its policies were disliked by Indians and together they revolted against the company. This led to the downfall of the company and the administration of India went directly under the Queen. In the following lines, you shall find information regarding the period when India was under British rule. Read about the British colonialism in India.
The First War of Independence was the result of growing Indian distrust of the British in 1857. Britain referred to the war as the Sepoy Mutiny.
The British were imperialist and invaders in India, so the people whose country was India wanted their country back.
George Washington led the british troops into battle during the French and Indian war where did he lead the troops?
he's lead the troops in India
The British wanted the
One reason is because the french and Indian war put the british in debt, so they had to tax the colonists.
He fought for the British side, as a loyal subject to his majesty's service.
The British gained control of more in the North
Why did British polices following the French and Indian War lead to increased tensions with American Colonists?
They provided them with weapons
It didn't directly lead to the sugar act. The British started to become more involved with the lives of the Colonists after the War of 1812. So in order to regulate the war debt the British passed the sugar act.
The French and Indian war put the British in a huge debt. This huge debt eventually led the British to tax the American colonies with a series of acts which the colonists saw as a violation of their liberty. As the British passed more acts, the colonists felt the need to declare independence.
The tide of the war changed in 1756 when William Pitt became the British Secretary of State. The British applied more resources.
it started to increase tension between colonies and British which lead to the revolutionary war and to independence now.
After the French and Indian War was concluded, British soldiers remained in America, and taxes were imposed on Americans to defer the cost of the war. As the taxes were not exorbitant, I think it was the presence of the British soldiers which made many Americans believe they had become more American than British, and they should be a separate country.
Its false. The Italians were driven back by a combination of Indian, British and Australian troops this occured in 1940, when the British lead Operation Compass began
Yes Ghana was lead by the British
Why did the outcome of the french and Indian war lead to nee conflicts between British settlers and native Americans?
British took over most of new france and now controlled native americans.British settlers began moving to this land
It would be that ,''A'', Strong character; military experience with the British army during the French and Indian War
farming lead to growing crops
The French and Indian War in the American colonies trained many officers to be able to lead men in battle. One of the most important of these was George Washington who served as a British Lt. Colonel during the French and Indian War.
a "lead" in British English means a leash.
The British passed a lot of laws during the French and Indian War but colonists generally ignored them because the soldiers were to busy with war to enforce them. When the war ended there were a ton of soldiers with nothing better to do than enforce the law. Britain passes a ton of new to pay for the war.
The British after the french and the Indian war had to pay there troops in order to do so they had to raise taxes on common things as tea. which lead to the Tea Act in 1773.
the french got so mad about loosing that they started a riot and the british reactled by starting the proclomation of 1763 to calm down the riot
The British taxed the colonists since they were so much in debt from the Frech adn Indian War. This sparked the beginning of "taxation without representation" protests in the colonies. The people did not like to be unfairly taxed by a country that they weren't even located near. This would eventually lead to the Ameican Revolution against the British, which the French actually helped us with. This is one of the main reasons why we… Read More
Because Britain won the French Indian or Seven Years War in the mid 1700's which lead to France abandoning most of it's North American Possessions.
It failed because of There was a king bahadur shah zafar even then he was king he does not lead it properly The revolt was not organised Some Indian rulers directly supported british
For growing developing brains and bodies of children lead stops the development. Lead stops the growing and could lead to death. Some symptoms of lead poisoning are stomachaches, cramping, constipation, or diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, persistent unexplained fatigue, headaches, and muscle weakness.
euphoria lead sinder is dr.palash sen
The British vs. French and Indian (native American) allies. It was about control of the land in the Ohio River which stretched from minnesota to Louisiana alongside the 13 colonies. The British won but this lead to a massive debt in the country, which led to high taxes in the colonies. This then led to realization of how little representation they have and unequal rights, and the fight for independence, thus leading to the American… Read More
WAR!!!! To be specific a lot of tension started growing between the British and the Colonies, and it did eventually lead to the American revolution. The colonists did not give up this subject lightly and that is why they named it the Boston Massacre.
Professor Omar Al-Terawi was one of the most important people who helped growing discontent lead to the american revolution
it poisons the plants growing in it
Why did the outcome of the French and Indian war lead to new conflicts between British settlers and Native Americans?
The victory by the British meant that the areas previously under French control were now open to potential colonization by British Americans. The primary attempt to avoid this, the Royal Proclamation of 1763, was ineffective at preventing pioneers from entering the Ohio Valley.
how did the french and indian war lead to friction between american colonists and britain
Typically, growing magic mushrooms is illegal and can lead to severe legal consequences.
The battle of Quebec lead to the fall of New France to the British because Quebec was vital to New Frances defense and the British did a surprise attack on them and the British won and Quebec had surrendered to the British.
No, it lead to the American Revolution.
it lead to Ireland freedom from British rule it lead to Ireland's freedom from British rule the unionists are hahah
The primary demand for lead in 2003 resulted from growing demand for rechargeable automobile batteries
The colonists wanted more land. The treaty of Paris ofter the war, gave all the land to the left of the Mississippi river to Spain, and all that was on the right went to the British colonies.
Wars cost money and at the end of the French and Indian war the British were broke, so they reasoned that the colonies owed a fair share of the cost of the war since it was fought in North America. The new emphasis on taxes and restrictions on imports made some colonists angry. The most upset were the smugglers because they were loosing business due to the British lowering the tea tax. It made the… Read More
the attacks that the British lead against the American forces is that they seized the American ships and they kidnapped American sailors.
The Indian Ocean
The lead singer is William Cowsill.
Shilpa Shukla is playing the lead. She is an Indian actress.
The cast of Indian Boy of the Southwest - 1962 includes: Chief Ned Nayatewa as Co-lead Roderick Pongyesva as Lead
The Roman Senate would be likely to lead the opposition to Caesar's growing power because they thought that Caesar would destroy the republic by accepting the crown.
There was no Indian Removal Act of 1890, just the Indian Removal Act of 1830 lead by president Andrew Jackson.
Answer General William Howe commanded British forces and Israel Putnam and William Prescott were in charge of the Massachusetts Militia. Thomas Gage lead the British and William Prescott lead the Americans.