Manifest Destiny was the belief that Americans would expand westward, and that was God's will or something like that. Through manifest destiny, the government wanted to obtain the land westward such as the Louisiana purchase, Hawaii, Cuba. All their territorial expansion. Involvement in conquering these territories resulted in a ton of land for the american people, money, resources which were obtained through wars. Along the lines, America gained some foes, and also established power by expanding their nation. As Americans gained more land, the citizens had new opportunites (in the new lands). Some decided to create utopian societies (which didn't really work out in the end); some established ethnic neighborhoods. Others created homesteads. Remember that farming was a lot more common back then, especially in the west (newest land).
The manifest destiny was the expansion to the waest
The United States. manifest destiny was the idea the United States should spread from coast to coast
Manifest destiny led to Texas becoming a part of the United States and lead to a war with Mexico.
manifest destiny
expansion of the united states westward to the pacific ocean
Manifest Destiny was the belief of the United States government that the USA should stretch from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. It was a westward expansion movement.
The United States. manifest destiny was the idea the United States should spread from coast to coast
the colonist if the united states.
Manifest destiny led to Texas becoming a part of the United States and lead to a war with Mexico.
Manifest Destiny was the belief that it was the United States' destiny and duty to expand its control and influence from the Atlantic to the Pacific. The primary sources attached to this question provide different perspectives on whether Manifest Destiny was justified. The first primary source, a speech given by John L. O'Sullivan in 1845, is in support of Manifest Destiny. OโSullivan argues that the United States has a right and a duty to expand its control and influence, as the country was founded on the principles of freedom and democracy. He states that it is the United States' "manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions." The second primary source, a speech given by Chief Seattle in 1854, is in opposition to Manifest Destiny. Chief Seattle argues that Manifest Destiny is an imperialistic endeavor that will bring destruction and death to the Indigenous peoples of North America. He states that the "White Manโ will take their land and resources, and that their culture will be destroyed in the process. It is difficult to determine whether Manifest Destiny was justified, as it depends on the individual's perspective. Some may argue that Manifest Destiny was justified, as it allowed the country to expand its influence and spread democracy throughout the continent. Others may argue that Manifest Destiny was not justified, as it brought destruction and death to Indigenous peoples and their cultures.
It doubled the size of the United States.
Manifest Destiny
Manifest Destiny
The Manifest Destiny was an idea made popular in the 1800's by John Louis O'Sullivan that the United States must expand its boundaries to the Pacific Ocean. Answer: The idea that the United States must expand westward
Manifest Destiny was the belief of the United States government that the USA should stretch from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean. It was a westward expansion movement.
Manifest Destiny jiijiji
expansion of the united states westward to the pacific ocean
manifest destiny