0
The principle of judicial review.
Ryleigh Runolfsson
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did john marshall say was the chief purpose of written constitution in marbury v madison?
John Marshall understood that supposing the Court awarded Marbury a writ of mandamus the Jefferson administration would then ignore it, and hence significantly weaken the authority of the courts.
The president named this person to be the first black to hold a seat on the supreme court?
Thurgood Marshall. He was appointed in 1967 by President Lyndon Johnson.
Key decisions of the Supreme Court under the leadership of John Marshall solidified the power of the Supreme Court to?
Key decisions of the supreme court under the leadership pf john marshall solidified the power of the supreme court to review the constitutionality of the state and federal law.
When did Thurgood Marshall became a US Supreme Court justice?
Thurgood Marshall Retired from his job in 1991.
Final interpreters of the constitution?
According to the US Constitution itself, the United States Supreme Court is the final interpreter of the Constitution. The Court's decisions are final and are seldom changed.
How did the Marshall court interpret the constitution in its ruling's?
The principle of judicial review.
How did the Marshall court interpret the Constitution in rulings?
The principle of judicial review.
How did the Marshall court interpret the constitution in it rulings?
The principle of judicial review.
How did the Marshall Court interpret the Constitution in it ruling?
The principle of judicial review.
How did Marshall Court interpret the constitution in its rulings?
The principle of judicial review.
How did the marshall court interpret the constitution in its rulings?
it gave the federal government more power over the states
How did the Marshall Court interpret the constitution in its rulling?
it gave the federal government more power over the states
How did the Marshall Court interpret the constitution in its rullings?
it gave the federal government more power over the states
How did the marshal court interpret the constitution in the rulings?
The Marshall Court set the precedent that US laws could be devalidated if they were found to violate the US Constitution and gave the courts this power.
What court can interpret the Constitution?
Any court can interpret the constitution, but the US Supreme Court is the final arbiter on constitutionality.
According to John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison who or what should interpret the Constitution?
Chief Justice John Marshall believed interpreting the Constitution was the responsibility of the Judicial branchof government. The Supreme Court of the United States is the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution.
How did the Marshall court interpret the constitutional in its rulings?
The principle of judicial review.
