it expanded the united states to the west as said by president butchman a chain frum east to west that will never be broke
the concept of manifest destiny changed American history in the nineteenth century by the united states expanding due to presidents buying states.(:
Manifest Destiny was a belief in the 1830s and 1840s that the "divine right" of the US was to expand westward toward the Pacific Ocean and conquer the entire continent (unoccupied except by the native tribes). This, of course, actually occurred, at least partly as a result of political pressure to follow this assumption.It was used by people who claimed it was "God's will" for the U.S to expand all the way to the Pacific Ocean. (Manifest destiny meaning obvious fate.)
The term 'Manifest Destiny" had everything to do with the movement of settlers heading west: if was the widely held belief by many in the US in the 19th century that the settlers were 'destined' by God to populate and conquer the whole of America and bring civilization and white virtues to the western lands. The era between 1812 and 1860 is for that very reason often called the "era of manifest destiny".Of course the Manifest Destiny theory had its opponents, and some argued at the time that this theory only meant that the eastern colonies should be a shining example for others to follow of a perfect Christian and democratic society; and that this ideal could only be watered down and corrupted once the settlers spread themselver too thinly over too large an area.So you can argue - as the 19th century Americans did - whether or not the theory was meant to encourage expansion to the west. But it never had 'nothing to do' with the movement west.
Manifest Destiny was the idea that the US would stretch from sea to sea, covering everything that it now covers. Manifest means "Obvious" and destiny usually refers to God's will. So it was something that people felt would just happen because that's what happening anyway. i couldent of said it better myself lol
14 European nations got together to prevent conflict between one another They got together to peacefully (excluding the Congo of course) split up Africa amongst themselves. Greed...They forgot to ask the inhabitants. "Manifest Destiny" no doubt!
Expansionists of the 1840s, mainly Democrats, championed the idea of a US that stretched from Atlantic to Pacific across the continent. Political influence in this regard led to the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). The only resistance to Manifest Destiny came from Whigs such as Abraham Lincoln, who wished to consolidate the national economy. Also, of course, the native tribes whose lands were rapidly overrun in the move to settle the West.
The term is Manifest Destiny. It was a 19th-century (1800s) doctrine or belief that people were justified in ensuring the expansion of the US throughout the American continents. Manifest Destiny was seen as both a moral right and a practical inevitable goal for the US to succeed as a nation. Of course, no one included "greed" or "treat others as you would treat yourself" in this moral stance of Manifest Destiny.
Manifest Destiny was a belief in the 1830s and 1840s that the "divine right" of the US was to expand westward toward the Pacific Ocean and conquer the entire continent (unoccupied except by the native tribes). This, of course, actually occurred, at least partly as a result of political pressure to follow this assumption.It was used by people who claimed it was "God's will" for the U.S to expand all the way to the Pacific Ocean. (Manifest destiny meaning obvious fate.)
The term 'Manifest Destiny" had everything to do with the movement of settlers heading west: if was the widely held belief by many in the US in the 19th century that the settlers were 'destined' by God to populate and conquer the whole of America and bring civilization and white virtues to the western lands. The era between 1812 and 1860 is for that very reason often called the "era of manifest destiny".Of course the Manifest Destiny theory had its opponents, and some argued at the time that this theory only meant that the eastern colonies should be a shining example for others to follow of a perfect Christian and democratic society; and that this ideal could only be watered down and corrupted once the settlers spread themselver too thinly over too large an area.So you can argue - as the 19th century Americans did - whether or not the theory was meant to encourage expansion to the west. But it never had 'nothing to do' with the movement west.
Manifest Destiny was the idea that the US would stretch from sea to sea, covering everything that it now covers. Manifest means "Obvious" and destiny usually refers to God's will. So it was something that people felt would just happen because that's what happening anyway. i couldent of said it better myself lol
The dictionary explains destiny as "An event (or a course of events) that will inevitably happen in the future". So destiny is the result of an action on our part. We can wait the result of that action which is destined to happen. Even if we change that action destiny will always be there, there is no escape, so must accept what destiny awaits us.
Well the U.S. went to war with Mexico. And all of this happened because of Manifest Destiny. After the war with Mexico we gained the Oregon Territory; it make up of Idaho, Washington, and Oregon of course.
two early doctrines the us followed was manifest destiny manifest destiny was a plan to cover the entire continent of north America (Canada, Mexico and the central American states) of course they didnt take all of Mexico or Canada but succeeded in reaching the pacific ocean another was the monroe doctrine (we wont get involved in European wars/affairs as long as europeans stay out of American business) of course the monroe doctrine was quite hypocritical when America took the philipenese and cuba from Spain.
of course she does!
Of course she is!
He wanted to acquire California at all costs, fulfilling the "Manifest Destiny" and expand slave territories -- Polk was himself part of the "Slave Power" movement. This of course, required him to invade Mexico. The ill-defined border between Mexico and Texas was the perfect pretext to invade Mexico, and after the Thornton Affair (1846) he started the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). He wanted to acquire California at all costs, fulfilling the "Manifest Destiny" and expand slave territories -- Polk was himself part of the "Slave Power" movement. This of course, required him to invade Mexico. The ill-defined border between Mexico and Texas was the perfect pretext to invade Mexico, and after the Thornton Affair (1846) he started the Mexican-American War (1846-1848).
14 European nations got together to prevent conflict between one another They got together to peacefully (excluding the Congo of course) split up Africa amongst themselves. Greed...They forgot to ask the inhabitants. "Manifest Destiny" no doubt!
Its simple.If authority to expand territory comes from an authority no one can be higher than, God, then that becomes the justification to take all the territory desired since it is Gods mandate. This is a fallacy of course, but, never the less, a long held policy by conquering armies.