It caused problems because whichever animal they killed to get the pelt to sell, was slowly dieing out. So that was a problem, because then there wouldn't be anything left to sell. Unless they thought of another animal to use as a trade item.
It appears that the First Nations peoples did not smelt metals from ores. For this reason, metal objects would have been scarce or non-existent, and highly prized. Therefore, the earliest trading was for small metal objects from the fisherman seeking cod off Newfoundland. Later, trade continued for manufactured metal items including axe heads and kettles, and also textiles such as blankets.
it gave them unnatural things to hunt with instead of using handmade things like bow and arrows
jhhe was in the fur trade
they brought Justin beavers.
Most men were not married when they first became involved in the fur trade. European women were extremely rare in the fur trade, and almost all of those women arrived with their husbands. Many fur trade men formed relationships with First Nations women, some going through a form of marriage in accorance with First Nations customs. Many children were born from such relationships. It was quite common for a man to leave his family behind when he left the trading post to which he had been assigned, and to form a new relationship at the next trading post. It was also not uncommon for a man to have more than one wife at the same time, at the same post.
Britain's interest was purely for becoming friends and accomplices with the first nations, while New Frances was to rule Canada.
They both like Fried Chicken
no. ------ No, there is no "Canadian" identity. Canada is a Confederation of many Nations and cultures, each with their own identity. The fur trade has played a large role in many of those Nations and Cultures but each has it's own interpretation. For example if your culture was trapping and trading the furs you would have one view. On the other hand if your ancestors were taking the furs to Europe for resale you would have a different view on how the fur trade shaped your identity. If your ancestors bought furs from others and traded to yet others who then sold the furs on the open market you would have yet another view on how the fur trade shaped your identity. If your forefathers never traded in furs and only used the routes created by fur traders you would have yet another view of the fur trade. The fur trade help create Canada but Canada is a Confederation of many nations, each with it's own history.
they brought Justin beavers.
He traded first nations people fur and armour and the first nations traded back telling him about his language and culture.
Yes, they traded fur
The first nations helped the Europeans because it was good to trade with them to get metals for fur.
Middlemen in the fur trade were fur traders or first nations who had been given furs from the producers (HBC and north west company) and had sold these furs to first nations or other consumers. Think of it as salesmen:)
They thought that they were peaceful people, only wanting to trade food an fur for goods
It was inportant Because The First Nations got weapons for hunting
The had similarites because they did the fur trade they traded fur to each other they also had the rivalry caused by these two nations
The Europeans gave them things such as metal pots, knives, guns, etc. The First Nations gave them medicine, fur, and showed them how to build canoes, and helped them build maps, etc.
the answer is the french people taught the first nations to speak French. They also had translators.
First fur trade millionaire was J J Astor See Wikipedia "Fur Trade"
The Fur Trade