During the middle ages, artists were considered humble craftspeople who merly put ideas from god into a visual form, but during the renaissance artists were greatly respected for their intellect and creativity. -M.H.
Middle Ages art was based on strictly religious form and features etc were not clearly defined. Renaissance art began using perspective, color, emotion, nature, and well defined features.
Fresco's weren't done in the middle ages. I think you are thinking of Renaissance artist Michelangelo.
which statement is fals about the middle class and the renaissance
The Middle Ages was the time before the Renaissance.
There was a certain overlap between the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, particularly in Italy, where the Renaissance began about a hundred years before the Middle Ages ended. So there was a point when they were the same. Fashions change, however, and this was especially true in both the Late Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Apart from that bit of overlap, clothing of the Renaissance and the Middle Ages were different.
During the Middle Ages and Renaissance in Europe women worshipped in churches.
Fresco's weren't done in the middle ages. I think you are thinking of Renaissance artist Michelangelo.
The Medieval world tended to be Theocentric. The Renaissance world tended to be Anthropocentric.
Art was more life like and realistic in renaissance art, the middle ages art was mostly looked flat and without depth.
Art was more life like and realistic in renaissance art, the middle ages art was mostly looked flat and without depth.
Art was more life like and realistic in renaissance art, the middle ages art was mostly looked flat and without depth.
perspective instead of only two dimensional
perspective instead of only two dimensional
They featured more realism and emotion
http://www.google.ca
They featured more realism and emotion
They featured more realism and emotion
They featured more realism and emotion.